2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Time Aspects of using audience response systems

Juraj Petrović, Dijana Tralić, Predrag Pale

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Audience response systems represent an important class of tools for improving lecture interactivity. Although they can provide a lecturer with valuable and timely data about his audience's opinions and understanding of the lecture, one of their main disadvantages reported in the literature is the additional time required for their usage within a time-constrained lecture. In this paper, the time aspects of using an audience response system are investigated. Using the data obtained through the usage of AuResS, a web-based audience response system, we investigated the time needed for the audience to answer questions posed by a lecturer on a live lecture, as well as audiences' general perception of the audience response system's advantages, disadvantages, and influence on the course of a lecture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Audience response systems represent an important class of tools for improving lecture interactivity. Although they can provide a lecturer with valuable and timely data about his audience's opinions and understanding of the lecture, one of their main disadvantages reported in the literature is the additional time required for their usage within a time-constrained lecture. In this paper, the time aspects of using an audience response system are investigated. Using the data obtained through the usage of AuResS, a web-based audience response system, we investigated the time needed for the audience to answer questions posed by a lecturer on a live lecture, as well as audiences' general perception of the audience response system's advantages, disadvantages, and influence on the course of a lecture.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Audience response systems represent an important class of tools for improving lecture interactivity. Although they can provide a lecturer with valuable and timely data about his audience's opinions and understanding of the lecture, one of their main disadvantages reported in the literature is the additional time required for their usage within a time-constrained lecture. In this paper, the time aspects of using an audience response system are investigated. Using the data obtained through the usage of AuResS, a web-based audience response system, we investigated the time needed for the audience to answer questions posed by a lecturer on a live lecture, as well as audiences' general perception of the audience response system's advantages, disadvantages, and influence on the course of a lecture.

Key concepts: Audience response, Interactivity, Computer science, Audience participation, Class (philosophy), Multimedia, Perception, Target audience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Time Aspects of using audience response systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens