2015ACS CatalysisRequires access

Mechanistic Study on Ligand-Controlled Rh(I)-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of Alkene-Benzocyclobutenone

Qianqian Lü, Bing Wang, Haizhu Yu, Yao Fu

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

Recently, Dong’s group [ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7567–7571; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1891–1895] reported the ligand-controlled selectivity of Rh-catalyzed intramolecular coupling reaction of alkene-benzocyclobutenone: the direct coupling product (i.e., fused-rings) was formed in the DPPB-assisted system (DPPB = PPh 2 (CH 2 ) 4 PPh 2 ), while the decarbonylative coupling product (i.e., spirocycles) was generated in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assited system. To explain this interesting selectivity, density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been carried out in the present study. It was found that the direct and decarbonylative couplings experience the same C(acyl)–C(sp 2 ) activation and alkene insertion steps. The following C–C reductive elimination or β-H elimination–decarbonylation–reductive elimination leads to the direct or decarbonylative coupling reaction, respectively. The coordination features of different ligands were found to significantly influence C–C reductive elimination and decarbonylation step. The requisite phosphine dissociation of DPPB ligand from Rh center for the decarbonylation step is disfavored, and thus, the reductive elimination and direct coupling reaction are favored therein. By contrast, a free coordination site is available on the Rh center in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assisted system, facilitating the decarbonylation process together with the generation of related decarbonylative coupling product.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently, Dong’s group [ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7567–7571; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1891–1895] reported the ligand-controlled selectivity of Rh-catalyzed intramolecular coupling reaction of alkene-benzocyclobutenone: the direct coupling product (i.e., fused-rings) was formed in the DPPB-assisted system (DPPB = PPh 2 (CH 2 ) 4 PPh 2 ), while the decarbonylative coupling product (i.e., spirocycles) was generated in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assited system. To explain this interesting selectivity, density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been carried out in the present study. It was found that the direct and decarbonylative couplings experience the same C(acyl)–C(sp 2 ) activation and alkene insertion steps. The following C–C reductive elimination or β-H elimination–decarbonylation–reductive elimination leads to the direct or decarbonylative coupling reaction, respectively. The coordination features of different ligands were found to significantly influence C–C reductive elimination and decarbonylation step. The requisite phosphine dissociation of DPPB ligand from Rh center for the decarbonylation step is disfavored, and thus, the reductive elimination and direct coupling reaction are favored therein. By contrast, a free coordination site is available on the Rh center in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assisted system, facilitating the decarbonylation process together with the generation of related decarbonylative coupling product.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently, Dong’s group [ Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7567–7571; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1891–1895] reported the ligand-controlled selectivity of Rh-catalyzed intramolecular coupling reaction of alkene-benzocyclobutenone: the direct coupling product (i.e., fused-rings) was formed in the DPPB-assisted system (DPPB = PPh 2 (CH 2 ) 4 PPh 2 ), while the decarbonylative coupling product (i.e., spirocycles) was generated in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assited system. To explain this interesting selectivity, density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been carried out in the present study. It was found that the direct and decarbonylative couplings experience the same C(acyl)–C(sp 2 ) activation and alkene insertion steps. The following C–C reductive elimination or β-H elimination–decarbonylation–reductive elimination leads to the direct or decarbonylative coupling reaction, respectively. The coordination features of different ligands were found to significantly influence C–C reductive elimination and decarbonylation step. The requisite phosphine dissociation of DPPB ligand from Rh center for the decarbonylation step is disfavored, and thus, the reductive elimination and direct coupling reaction are favored therein. By contrast, a free coordination site is available on the Rh center in the P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 -assisted system, facilitating the decarbonylation process together with the generation of related decarbonylative coupling product.

Key concepts: Decarbonylation, Reductive elimination, Chemistry, Alkene, Intramolecular force, Phosphine, Ligand (biochemistry), Selectivity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mechanistic Study on Ligand-Controlled Rh(I)-Catalyzed Coupling Reaction of Alkene-Benzocyclobutenone — Research Paper | ScholarLens