2006Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake EngineeringOpen access

The serviceability of normal-use, non-domestic buildings in earthquakes

David J. Dowrick

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper reports on an empirical study of whether it is necessary to carry out design checks on the serviceability of normal-use non-domestic buildings in earthquakes in New Zealand. It is found that at the relevant hazard level, i.e. at a return period of 25 years, the highest intensity anywhere in New Zealand is Modified Mercalli VII (MM7). At that intensity, no loss of function (predictable by a serviceability design check) has been reported in any structures classified as Buildings Type III (brittle) or better, since the introduction of reinforced concrete construction. For normal-use non-domestic structures designed for the ultimate limit state earthquake loading, the author contends (with one interim proviso affecting 10 percent of the country) that serviceability can be deemed to be satisfactory for new buildings anywhere in the New Zealand.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reports on an empirical study of whether it is necessary to carry out design checks on the serviceability of normal-use non-domestic buildings in earthquakes in New Zealand. It is found that at the relevant hazard level, i.e. at a return period of 25 years, the highest intensity anywhere in New Zealand is Modified Mercalli VII (MM7). At that intensity, no loss of function (predictable by a serviceability design check) has been reported in any structures classified as Buildings Type III (brittle) or better, since the introduction of reinforced concrete construction. For normal-use non-domestic structures designed for the ultimate limit state earthquake loading, the author contends (with one interim proviso affecting 10 percent of the country) that serviceability can be deemed to be satisfactory for new buildings anywhere in the New Zealand.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reports on an empirical study of whether it is necessary to carry out design checks on the serviceability of normal-use non-domestic buildings in earthquakes in New Zealand. It is found that at the relevant hazard level, i.e. at a return period of 25 years, the highest intensity anywhere in New Zealand is Modified Mercalli VII (MM7). At that intensity, no loss of function (predictable by a serviceability design check) has been reported in any structures classified as Buildings Type III (brittle) or better, since the introduction of reinforced concrete construction. For normal-use non-domestic structures designed for the ultimate limit state earthquake loading, the author contends (with one interim proviso affecting 10 percent of the country) that serviceability can be deemed to be satisfactory for new buildings anywhere in the New Zealand.

Key concepts: Serviceability (structure), Mercalli intensity scale, Engineering, Interim, Forensic engineering, Structural engineering, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source