1999Earthquake SpectraRequires access

Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California

David J. Wald, Vincent Quitoriano, Thomas H. Heaton, Hiroo Kanamori

Open publisher page 890 citations

Abstract

We have developed regression relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity ( I mm ) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) by comparing horizontal peak ground motions to observed intensities for eight significant California earthquakes. For the limited range of Modified Mercalli intensities ( I mm ), we find that for peak acceleration with V ≤ I mm ≤ VIII, I mm = 3.66 log ( PGA ) − 1.66, and for peak velocity with V ≤ I mm ≤ IX, I mm = 3.47 log ( PGV ) + 2.35. From comparison with observed intensity maps, we find that a combined regression based on peak velocity for intensity > VII and on peak acceleration for intensity < VII is most suitable for reproducing observed I mm patterns, consistent with high intensities being related to damage (proportional to ground velocity) and with lower intensities determined by felt accounts (most sensitive to higher‐frequency ground acceleration). These new I mm relationships are significantly different from the Trifunac and Brady (1975) correlations, which have been used extensively in loss estimation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have developed regression relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity ( I mm ) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) by comparing horizontal peak ground motions to observed intensities for eight significant California earthquakes. For the limited range of Modified Mercalli intensities ( I mm ), we find that for peak acceleration with V ≤ I mm ≤ VIII, I mm = 3.66 log ( PGA ) − 1.66, and for peak velocity with V ≤ I mm ≤ IX, I mm = 3.47 log ( PGV ) + 2.35. From comparison with observed intensity maps, we find that a combined regression based on peak velocity for intensity > VII and on peak acceleration for intensity < VII is most suitable for reproducing observed I mm patterns, consistent with high intensities being related to damage (proportional to ground velocity) and with lower intensities determined by felt accounts (most sensitive to higher‐frequency ground acceleration). These new I mm relationships are significantly different from the Trifunac and Brady (1975) correlations, which have been used extensively in loss estimation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 890 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have developed regression relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity ( I mm ) and peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) by comparing horizontal peak ground motions to observed intensities for eight significant California earthquakes. For the limited range of Modified Mercalli intensities ( I mm ), we find that for peak acceleration with V ≤ I mm ≤ VIII, I mm = 3.66 log ( PGA ) − 1.66, and for peak velocity with V ≤ I mm ≤ IX, I mm = 3.47 log ( PGV ) + 2.35. From comparison with observed intensity maps, we find that a combined regression based on peak velocity for intensity > VII and on peak acceleration for intensity < VII is most suitable for reproducing observed I mm patterns, consistent with high intensities being related to damage (proportional to ground velocity) and with lower intensities determined by felt accounts (most sensitive to higher‐frequency ground acceleration). These new I mm relationships are significantly different from the Trifunac and Brady (1975) correlations, which have been used extensively in loss estimation.

Key concepts: Mercalli intensity scale, Intensity (physics), Acceleration, Peak ground acceleration, Ground motion, Range (aeronautics), Physics, Geodesy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California — Research Paper | ScholarLens