2008Parking TodayRequires access

Why Conventional Parking Meters

Bobra Wilbanks

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article describes the advantages of conventional parking meters over other methods of paying for street parking such as pay stations and cellphone parking. The author describes the advantages of the conventional meters as being the low cost for upgrades, convenience and less confusion for people parking, and easy maintenance. Further, they are very simple for officers to enforce without having to try to match up license plates or sticker numbers. The author then counters some common arguments against conventional meters which are aesthetics, no receipt and that conventional meters can’t take credit cards. The author suggests that other methods of parking enforcement can be equally ugly, the lack of receipts saves paper, and the inability to use credit cards prevents identity fraud. Finally, the author gives suggestions of features to look for when purchasing parking meters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes the advantages of conventional parking meters over other methods of paying for street parking such as pay stations and cellphone parking. The author describes the advantages of the conventional meters as being the low cost for upgrades, convenience and less confusion for people parking, and easy maintenance. Further, they are very simple for officers to enforce without having to try to match up license plates or sticker numbers. The author then counters some common arguments against conventional meters which are aesthetics, no receipt and that conventional meters can’t take credit cards. The author suggests that other methods of parking enforcement can be equally ugly, the lack of receipts saves paper, and the inability to use credit cards prevents identity fraud. Finally, the author gives suggestions of features to look for when purchasing parking meters.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes the advantages of conventional parking meters over other methods of paying for street parking such as pay stations and cellphone parking. The author describes the advantages of the conventional meters as being the low cost for upgrades, convenience and less confusion for people parking, and easy maintenance. Further, they are very simple for officers to enforce without having to try to match up license plates or sticker numbers. The author then counters some common arguments against conventional meters which are aesthetics, no receipt and that conventional meters can’t take credit cards. The author suggests that other methods of parking enforcement can be equally ugly, the lack of receipts saves paper, and the inability to use credit cards prevents identity fraud. Finally, the author gives suggestions of features to look for when purchasing parking meters.

Key concepts: Confusion, Parking lot, License, Parking guidance and information, Purchasing, Enforcement, Computer security, Receipt

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why Conventional Parking Meters — Research Paper | ScholarLens