2016BIRDEM Medical JournalOpen access

A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional Hernia Repair

Md. Noor Alam, Md Rajibul Haque Talukder, Md Roushan Iqbal, Raihan Anwar, Humayun Kabir Chowdhury

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to compare between laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair.Methods and Materials: The study was conducted in different tertiary hospitals of Dhaka between January 2011 to December 2012 and in 96 patients with incisional hernia. Among them, 68 patients underwent open repair and 28 underwent laparoscopic repair. Both procedures usually consisted of applying a synthetic mesh overlapping the defect. They were followed up for one year to observe the clinical outcome.Results: Mean operative time was shorter in laparoscopic group in comparison to open procedure and mean post operative hospital stay was less than 3 days in laparoscopic group and above 7 days in open group. In the laparoscopic group return to normal activities/work after surgery was less than 2 weeks but after open procedure it was more than 3 weeks. Analgesics requirement was also lower in the laparoscopic group. Post operative complications were observed in 33.82% (23) patients in open hernioplasty group and in 7.14% (2) patients in laparoscopic group which showed significant difference (p<0.05). There was no recurrence in the laparoscopic group during one year follow-up.Conclusion: Data suggest laparoscopic repair is superior to open repair because of less complications, relapses and short hospital stay but long term follow up is required.Birdem Med J 2015; 5(1) Supplement: 29-33

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aims: This study aims to compare between laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair.Methods and Materials: The study was conducted in different tertiary hospitals of Dhaka between January 2011 to December 2012 and in 96 patients with incisional hernia. Among them, 68 patients underwent open repair and 28 underwent laparoscopic repair. Both procedures usually consisted of applying a synthetic mesh overlapping the defect. They were followed up for one year to observe the clinical outcome.Results: Mean operative time was shorter in laparoscopic group in comparison to open procedure and mean post operative hospital stay was less than 3 days in laparoscopic group and above 7 days in open group. In the laparoscopic group return to normal activities/work after surgery was less than 2 weeks but after open procedure it was more than 3 weeks. Analgesics requirement was also lower in the laparoscopic group. Post operative complications were observed in 33.82% (23) patients in open hernioplasty group and in 7.14% (2) patients in laparoscopic group which showed significant difference (p<0.05). There was no recurrence in the laparoscopic group during one year follow-up.Conclusion: Data suggest laparoscopic repair is superior to open repair because of less complications, relapses and short hospital stay but long term follow up is required.Birdem Med J 2015; 5(1) Supplement: 29-33

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aims: This study aims to compare between laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair.Methods and Materials: The study was conducted in different tertiary hospitals of Dhaka between January 2011 to December 2012 and in 96 patients with incisional hernia. Among them, 68 patients underwent open repair and 28 underwent laparoscopic repair. Both procedures usually consisted of applying a synthetic mesh overlapping the defect. They were followed up for one year to observe the clinical outcome.Results: Mean operative time was shorter in laparoscopic group in comparison to open procedure and mean post operative hospital stay was less than 3 days in laparoscopic group and above 7 days in open group. In the laparoscopic group return to normal activities/work after surgery was less than 2 weeks but after open procedure it was more than 3 weeks. Analgesics requirement was also lower in the laparoscopic group. Post operative complications were observed in 33.82% (23) patients in open hernioplasty group and in 7.14% (2) patients in laparoscopic group which showed significant difference (p<0.05). There was no recurrence in the laparoscopic group during one year follow-up.Conclusion: Data suggest laparoscopic repair is superior to open repair because of less complications, relapses and short hospital stay but long term follow up is required.Birdem Med J 2015; 5(1) Supplement: 29-33

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Incisional hernia, Laparoscopy, Hernia, Open surgery, Laparoscopic surgery, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional Hernia Repair — Research Paper | ScholarLens