1999Gynaecological EndoscopyRequires access

Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery

Harrith M. Hasson

Open publisher page 90 citations

Abstract

Objective To describe the technique of open laparoscopy and compare the rates of its complications to those of closed laparoscopy. Design Medline search, review of the literature and the author's experience. Results For open laparoscopy, the rate of umbilical infection in 15 622 cases was 0.4%, that of bowel injury in 20 335 cases was 0.1%, based on prospective, retrospective studies and a mail survey. Prospective and retrospective studies dealing with closed laparoscopy reported the following complication rates: umbilical infection: 1% of 4377 cases; vascular injury: 0.2% of 94 863 cases: visceral injury: 0.2% of 91 272 cases. The operating time for open and closed laparoscopy were substantially similar. Conclusion Open laparoscopy is advocated as the preferred method of access for laparoscopic surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To describe the technique of open laparoscopy and compare the rates of its complications to those of closed laparoscopy. Design Medline search, review of the literature and the author's experience. Results For open laparoscopy, the rate of umbilical infection in 15 622 cases was 0.4%, that of bowel injury in 20 335 cases was 0.1%, based on prospective, retrospective studies and a mail survey. Prospective and retrospective studies dealing with closed laparoscopy reported the following complication rates: umbilical infection: 1% of 4377 cases; vascular injury: 0.2% of 94 863 cases: visceral injury: 0.2% of 91 272 cases. The operating time for open and closed laparoscopy were substantially similar. Conclusion Open laparoscopy is advocated as the preferred method of access for laparoscopic surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 90 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To describe the technique of open laparoscopy and compare the rates of its complications to those of closed laparoscopy. Design Medline search, review of the literature and the author's experience. Results For open laparoscopy, the rate of umbilical infection in 15 622 cases was 0.4%, that of bowel injury in 20 335 cases was 0.1%, based on prospective, retrospective studies and a mail survey. Prospective and retrospective studies dealing with closed laparoscopy reported the following complication rates: umbilical infection: 1% of 4377 cases; vascular injury: 0.2% of 94 863 cases: visceral injury: 0.2% of 91 272 cases. The operating time for open and closed laparoscopy were substantially similar. Conclusion Open laparoscopy is advocated as the preferred method of access for laparoscopic surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopy, Open surgery, Surgery, Retrospective cohort study, Prospective cohort study, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens