2008DMW - Deutsche Medizinische WochenschriftRequires access

Dextran 40 oder HAES 200/0,5? - Hämorheologie der Langzeitbehandlung beim ischämischen zerebralen Insult

A. Haaß, H K Kroemer, Hans‐Jürgen Jäger, Katharina Müller, Ignace De Decker, Eric Wagner, К. Schimrigk

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

Haemorheological parameters on long-term treatment of ischaemic stroke were measured in two groups of 12 patients receiving dextran 40 or hydroxyethyl starch (HES 200). Both substances similarly lowered haematocrit and whole-blood viscosity. Dextran produced a clear-cut increase in plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. The effects were due to a marked increase in the plasma concentration of dextran caused by an accumulation of large molecules. HES 200 improved plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. Since these haemorheological parameters are of special importance for improving a disordered microcirculation as would occur at the margins of the ischaemic lesion, HES 200 would seem to be the appropriate plasma expander in long-term treatment with haemodilution. The differences between dextran 40 and HES 200 become the more marked the higher the volume infused.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Haemorheological parameters on long-term treatment of ischaemic stroke were measured in two groups of 12 patients receiving dextran 40 or hydroxyethyl starch (HES 200). Both substances similarly lowered haematocrit and whole-blood viscosity. Dextran produced a clear-cut increase in plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. The effects were due to a marked increase in the plasma concentration of dextran caused by an accumulation of large molecules. HES 200 improved plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. Since these haemorheological parameters are of special importance for improving a disordered microcirculation as would occur at the margins of the ischaemic lesion, HES 200 would seem to be the appropriate plasma expander in long-term treatment with haemodilution. The differences between dextran 40 and HES 200 become the more marked the higher the volume infused.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Haemorheological parameters on long-term treatment of ischaemic stroke were measured in two groups of 12 patients receiving dextran 40 or hydroxyethyl starch (HES 200). Both substances similarly lowered haematocrit and whole-blood viscosity. Dextran produced a clear-cut increase in plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. The effects were due to a marked increase in the plasma concentration of dextran caused by an accumulation of large molecules. HES 200 improved plasma viscosity and red-cell aggregation. Since these haemorheological parameters are of special importance for improving a disordered microcirculation as would occur at the margins of the ischaemic lesion, HES 200 would seem to be the appropriate plasma expander in long-term treatment with haemodilution. The differences between dextran 40 and HES 200 become the more marked the higher the volume infused.

Key concepts: Hydroxyethyl starch, Dextran, Dextran 70, Microcirculation, Blood viscosity, Red Cell, Erythrocyte aggregation, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dextran 40 oder HAES 200/0,5? - Hämorheologie der Langzeitbehandlung beim ischämischen zerebralen Insult — Research Paper | ScholarLens