1992PubMedRequires access

Cement thickness and microleakage under Dicor crowns: an in vivo investigation.

Marco Ferrari

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

This in vivo study recorded the microleakage and marginal discrepancies of cast glass-ceramic cemented crowns compared to gold onlays and a metal ceramic restoration. Within the limits of the small number of samples and the variables inherent in an in vivo study, it was found that (1) dentin bonding agents are not strong enough to produce a gap-free cementation, (2) the marginal adaptation of beveled metal restorations is better than that of glass-ceramic crowns, and (3) the marginal adaptation of cast glass-ceramic crowns is clinically acceptable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This in vivo study recorded the microleakage and marginal discrepancies of cast glass-ceramic cemented crowns compared to gold onlays and a metal ceramic restoration. Within the limits of the small number of samples and the variables inherent in an in vivo study, it was found that (1) dentin bonding agents are not strong enough to produce a gap-free cementation, (2) the marginal adaptation of beveled metal restorations is better than that of glass-ceramic crowns, and (3) the marginal adaptation of cast glass-ceramic crowns is clinically acceptable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This in vivo study recorded the microleakage and marginal discrepancies of cast glass-ceramic cemented crowns compared to gold onlays and a metal ceramic restoration. Within the limits of the small number of samples and the variables inherent in an in vivo study, it was found that (1) dentin bonding agents are not strong enough to produce a gap-free cementation, (2) the marginal adaptation of beveled metal restorations is better than that of glass-ceramic crowns, and (3) the marginal adaptation of cast glass-ceramic crowns is clinically acceptable.

Key concepts: Materials science, Bevel, Cementation (geology), Ceramic, Glass-ceramic, Dentistry, Dental porcelain, Lithium disilicate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cement thickness and microleakage under Dicor crowns: an in vivo investigation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens