Cement thickness and microleakage under Dicor crowns: an in vivo investigation.
Marco Ferrari
Abstract
Marco Ferrari
Abstract
This in vivo study recorded the microleakage and marginal discrepancies of cast glass-ceramic cemented crowns compared to gold onlays and a metal ceramic restoration. Within the limits of the small number of samples and the variables inherent in an in vivo study, it was found that (1) dentin bonding agents are not strong enough to produce a gap-free cementation, (2) the marginal adaptation of beveled metal restorations is better than that of glass-ceramic crowns, and (3) the marginal adaptation of cast glass-ceramic crowns is clinically acceptable.
OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This in vivo study recorded the microleakage and marginal discrepancies of cast glass-ceramic cemented crowns compared to gold onlays and a metal ceramic restoration. Within the limits of the small number of samples and the variables inherent in an in vivo study, it was found that (1) dentin bonding agents are not strong enough to produce a gap-free cementation, (2) the marginal adaptation of beveled metal restorations is better than that of glass-ceramic crowns, and (3) the marginal adaptation of cast glass-ceramic crowns is clinically acceptable.
Key concepts: Materials science, Bevel, Cementation (geology), Ceramic, Glass-ceramic, Dentistry, Dental porcelain, Lithium disilicate