1993PubMedRequires access

[The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension].

Zhang Wz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were investigated in 137 consecutive subjects (54 healthy normotensives and 83 uncomplicated patients with essential hypertension) who underwent 24-hour noninvasive ABP monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. In the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was not correlated with average daytime (6AM-10PM) or nighttime (10PM-6AM) systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) except for age (r = 0.405, P < 0.01). In the hypertensive group, however, LVMIs were significantly correlated with average daytime SBP (r = 0.315, P < 0.01), nighttime SBP (r = 0.408, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = 0.304, P < 0.01). Furthermore, significant inverse correlations were found between LVMI and percentage of nocturnal reduction of daytime SBP (r = -0.393, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = -0.308, P < 0.01). The results suggest that the average levels of ABP, particularly, the level of ABP during night and the loss of circadian variation of blood pressure, would be responsible for the development of LVH. The control of blood pressure and restoration of circadian blood pressure variation might be necessary for the reversal of LVH in hypertensive patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were investigated in 137 consecutive subjects (54 healthy normotensives and 83 uncomplicated patients with essential hypertension) who underwent 24-hour noninvasive ABP monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. In the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was not correlated with average daytime (6AM-10PM) or nighttime (10PM-6AM) systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) except for age (r = 0.405, P < 0.01). In the hypertensive group, however, LVMIs were significantly correlated with average daytime SBP (r = 0.315, P < 0.01), nighttime SBP (r = 0.408, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = 0.304, P < 0.01). Furthermore, significant inverse correlations were found between LVMI and percentage of nocturnal reduction of daytime SBP (r = -0.393, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = -0.308, P < 0.01). The results suggest that the average levels of ABP, particularly, the level of ABP during night and the loss of circadian variation of blood pressure, would be responsible for the development of LVH. The control of blood pressure and restoration of circadian blood pressure variation might be necessary for the reversal of LVH in hypertensive patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were investigated in 137 consecutive subjects (54 healthy normotensives and 83 uncomplicated patients with essential hypertension) who underwent 24-hour noninvasive ABP monitoring and M-mode echocardiography. In the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was not correlated with average daytime (6AM-10PM) or nighttime (10PM-6AM) systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) except for age (r = 0.405, P < 0.01). In the hypertensive group, however, LVMIs were significantly correlated with average daytime SBP (r = 0.315, P < 0.01), nighttime SBP (r = 0.408, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = 0.304, P < 0.01). Furthermore, significant inverse correlations were found between LVMI and percentage of nocturnal reduction of daytime SBP (r = -0.393, P < 0.01) and DBP (r = -0.308, P < 0.01). The results suggest that the average levels of ABP, particularly, the level of ABP during night and the loss of circadian variation of blood pressure, would be responsible for the development of LVH. The control of blood pressure and restoration of circadian blood pressure variation might be necessary for the reversal of LVH in hypertensive patients.

Key concepts: Ambulatory blood pressure, Blood pressure, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Essential hypertension, Internal medicine, Medicine, Cardiology, Circadian rhythm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens