[Clinical investigation of radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars].
Gang Yu, Ling Ye, Dingming Huang
Abstract
Gang Yu, Ling Ye, Dingming Huang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and treatment of radix entomolaris (RE) in mandibular first molars. METHODS: 378 cases of mandibular first molars with root canal therapy were collected. The case included clinical records and periapical radiographs of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. The root number, root canal number and root canal therapy were investigated. RESULTS: The RE prevalence of mandibular first molars was 26.98% (102/378). Both gender and bilateral occurrence of RE did not show a significantly difference (P>0.05), but there was a significantly greater incidence of instrument separation, lateral perforation and underfill of the root canals in RE than other canals in mandibular first molars (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The RE prevalence of mandibular first molar is high and there is a significantly greater incidence of instrument separation, lateral perforation and underfill of the canals in RE than other canals in mandibular first molars.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and treatment of radix entomolaris (RE) in mandibular first molars. METHODS: 378 cases of mandibular first molars with root canal therapy were collected. The case included clinical records and periapical radiographs of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. The root number, root canal number and root canal therapy were investigated. RESULTS: The RE prevalence of mandibular first molars was 26.98% (102/378). Both gender and bilateral occurrence of RE did not show a significantly difference (P>0.05), but there was a significantly greater incidence of instrument separation, lateral perforation and underfill of the root canals in RE than other canals in mandibular first molars (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The RE prevalence of mandibular first molar is high and there is a significantly greater incidence of instrument separation, lateral perforation and underfill of the canals in RE than other canals in mandibular first molars.
Key concepts: Molar, Medicine, Dentistry, Perforation, Root canal, Mandibular first molar, Mandibular second molar, Orthodontics