[The general surgeon's experience in emergency gynaecological laparoscopy].
Mario Schietroma, Recchia Cl, Francesco Carlei, Marco Rossi, Enang Gn, M. A. Pistoia, Silvia S. Orsini, M Simi
Abstract
Mario Schietroma, Recchia Cl, Francesco Carlei, Marco Rossi, Enang Gn, M. A. Pistoia, Silvia S. Orsini, M Simi
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopy plays a very important role in the diagnosis and treatment of uncertain surgical diseases. Its use is not very clear, in part because it is a very new technique and secondly because its application in emergency surgery is very recent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical approach. METHODS: In the last six years, during emergency laparoscopy, we diagnosed various gynaecological diseases. We performed 4 ovarian cystectomies (25%), 2 salpingectomies (12.5%), 6 salpingo-oophorectomies (37.5%), 2 myomectomies (18.75%), 1 endocoagulation (6.25%). RESULTS: Neither conversion in open surgery, nor major postoperatory complications were noted. Intervention time was shorter than that of the open technique. Return to normal activity was earlier. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contribute to demonstrate that, in emergency surgery, laparoscopy constitute a valid and efficient diagnostic and therapeutic technique. It is indicated for the treatment of acute abdomen of unknown origin.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopy plays a very important role in the diagnosis and treatment of uncertain surgical diseases. Its use is not very clear, in part because it is a very new technique and secondly because its application in emergency surgery is very recent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical approach. METHODS: In the last six years, during emergency laparoscopy, we diagnosed various gynaecological diseases. We performed 4 ovarian cystectomies (25%), 2 salpingectomies (12.5%), 6 salpingo-oophorectomies (37.5%), 2 myomectomies (18.75%), 1 endocoagulation (6.25%). RESULTS: Neither conversion in open surgery, nor major postoperatory complications were noted. Intervention time was shorter than that of the open technique. Return to normal activity was earlier. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contribute to demonstrate that, in emergency surgery, laparoscopy constitute a valid and efficient diagnostic and therapeutic technique. It is indicated for the treatment of acute abdomen of unknown origin.
Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopy, Open surgery, General surgery, Emergency surgery, Acute abdomen, Abdomen, Surgery