2015Journal of HypertensionRequires access

6D.07

Pamela Maffioli, Arrigo F.G. Cicero, Davide Romano, Angela D’Angelo, Giuseppe Derosa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of amlodipine alone, compared to amlodipine + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), on some inflammatory and endothelial damage markers in patients affected by essential hypertension. Design and method: We enrolled 213 hypertensive patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were randomised to amlodipine 5 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg + ASA for three months; then, if adequate blood pressure control was not reached, amlodipine was up-titrated to 10 mg/day for further 3 months and compared to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg. We evaluate, at baseline, after 3 and 6 months: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-alfa), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble CD40 ligand (sCDL40). Results: After 3 months of therapy, no variations of the above cited markers were recorded with amlodipine alone. Patients treated with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg, instead, showed a reduction of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40, and an increase of ADN, both compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all) and to amlodipine alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all), but no differences were recorded compared to amlodipine alone. One hundred and seven patients continued the study, and were up-titrated to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg or to amlodipine 10 mg alone. We observed a decrease of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40 and an increase of ADN in both groups compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for amlodipine alone, and p < 0.01 for amlodipine + ASA). Values recorded with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA were better than the ones recorded with amlodipine 10 mg alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased compared to baseline only with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA. No significant serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The addition of ASA to anti-hypertensive therapy gave a better improvement of inflammatory parameters compared to amlodipine alone, suggesting a role of ASA in reducing inflammation and endothelial damage independently from the blood pressure reduction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate the effects of amlodipine alone, compared to amlodipine + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), on some inflammatory and endothelial damage markers in patients affected by essential hypertension. Design and method: We enrolled 213 hypertensive patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were randomised to amlodipine 5 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg + ASA for three months; then, if adequate blood pressure control was not reached, amlodipine was up-titrated to 10 mg/day for further 3 months and compared to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg. We evaluate, at baseline, after 3 and 6 months: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-alfa), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble CD40 ligand (sCDL40). Results: After 3 months of therapy, no variations of the above cited markers were recorded with amlodipine alone. Patients treated with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg, instead, showed a reduction of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40, and an increase of ADN, both compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all) and to amlodipine alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all), but no differences were recorded compared to amlodipine alone. One hundred and seven patients continued the study, and were up-titrated to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg or to amlodipine 10 mg alone. We observed a decrease of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40 and an increase of ADN in both groups compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for amlodipine alone, and p < 0.01 for amlodipine + ASA). Values recorded with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA were better than the ones recorded with amlodipine 10 mg alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased compared to baseline only with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA. No significant serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The addition of ASA to anti-hypertensive therapy gave a better improvement of inflammatory parameters compared to amlodipine alone, suggesting a role of ASA in reducing inflammation and endothelial damage independently from the blood pressure reduction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of amlodipine alone, compared to amlodipine + acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), on some inflammatory and endothelial damage markers in patients affected by essential hypertension. Design and method: We enrolled 213 hypertensive patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were randomised to amlodipine 5 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg + ASA for three months; then, if adequate blood pressure control was not reached, amlodipine was up-titrated to 10 mg/day for further 3 months and compared to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg. We evaluate, at baseline, after 3 and 6 months: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-alfa), interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), myeloperoxidase (MPO), soluble CD40 ligand (sCDL40). Results: After 3 months of therapy, no variations of the above cited markers were recorded with amlodipine alone. Patients treated with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg, instead, showed a reduction of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40, and an increase of ADN, both compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all) and to amlodipine alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased with amlodipine 5 mg + ASA 100 mg compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for all), but no differences were recorded compared to amlodipine alone. One hundred and seven patients continued the study, and were up-titrated to amlodipine 10 mg + ASA 100 mg or to amlodipine 10 mg alone. We observed a decrease of Hs-CRP, TNF-alfa, MPO, and sCDL40 and an increase of ADN in both groups compared to baseline (p < 0.05 for amlodipine alone, and p < 0.01 for amlodipine + ASA). Values recorded with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA were better than the ones recorded with amlodipine 10 mg alone (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding IL-1beta, it decreased compared to baseline only with amlodipine 10 mg + ASA. No significant serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The addition of ASA to anti-hypertensive therapy gave a better improvement of inflammatory parameters compared to amlodipine alone, suggesting a role of ASA in reducing inflammation and endothelial damage independently from the blood pressure reduction.

Key concepts: Amlodipine, Medicine, Myeloperoxidase, Internal medicine, Blood pressure, Lisinopril, Gastroenterology, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
6D.07 — Research Paper | ScholarLens