2010Polskie Archiwum Medycyny WewnętrznejOpen access

Comparison of selected methods for fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women. Analysis of the Łódź population in the EPOLOS study

Elżbieta Skowrońska‐Jóźwiak, Agata Wójcicka, R Lorenc, Andrzej Lewiñski

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The major challenge when administering osteoporosis treatment is to identify patients with the highest fracture risk. FRAX is a new algorithm that integrates clinical risk factors of fracture and the results of densitometry. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of FRAX in identifying patients that should receive osteoporosis treatment and compare it with other methods of fracture risk assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved a random sample of 94 postmenopausal women, aged 55 to 79 years, who had not been previously treated for osteoporosis (a part of the EPOLOS [European Polish Osteoporosis Study] population recruited from the region of Łódź, Poland). Clinical risk factors were evaluated and densitometry of the femoral neck was performed. Patients were eligible for treatment on the basis of previous osteoporotic fractures, densitometry results, semiquantitative tabular method (SQM) (according to the Osteoporosis Society of Canada Recommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting), and a 10-year fracture risk (calculated with the British FRAX tool, using different thresholds). RESULTS: Using the FRAX method, between 5.2% to 52% of the examined women would be eligible for treatment, depending on the threshold applied. If the treatment decision was based on a history of vertebral fractures, 4.2% of women would be eligible for treatment, and if other fractures were considered - 20.2%. If the decision was based on densitometry results, 8.5% of women would be eligible for treatment. We observed a high fracture risk in 7%, moderate risk in 19%, and low risk in 74% of women examined by the SQM. CONCLUSIONS: Proper use of FRAX in Poland requires determination of the intervention threshold. Use of FRAX changes the demographic profile of women eligible for therapy, increasing their number in older age groups.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: The major challenge when administering osteoporosis treatment is to identify patients with the highest fracture risk. FRAX is a new algorithm that integrates clinical risk factors of fracture and the results of densitometry. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of FRAX in identifying patients that should receive osteoporosis treatment and compare it with other methods of fracture risk assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved a random sample of 94 postmenopausal women, aged 55 to 79 years, who had not been previously treated for osteoporosis (a part of the EPOLOS [European Polish Osteoporosis Study] population recruited from the region of Łódź, Poland). Clinical risk factors were evaluated and densitometry of the femoral neck was performed. Patients were eligible for treatment on the basis of previous osteoporotic fractures, densitometry results, semiquantitative tabular method (SQM) (according to the Osteoporosis Society of Canada Recommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting), and a 10-year fracture risk (calculated with the British FRAX tool, using different thresholds). RESULTS: Using the FRAX method, between 5.2% to 52% of the examined women would be eligible for treatment, depending on the threshold applied. If the treatment decision was based on a history of vertebral fractures, 4.2% of women would be eligible for treatment, and if other fractures were considered - 20.2%. If the decision was based on densitometry results, 8.5% of women would be eligible for treatment. We observed a high fracture risk in 7%, moderate risk in 19%, and low risk in 74% of women examined by the SQM. CONCLUSIONS: Proper use of FRAX in Poland requires determination of the intervention threshold. Use of FRAX changes the demographic profile of women eligible for therapy, increasing their number in older age groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: The major challenge when administering osteoporosis treatment is to identify patients with the highest fracture risk. FRAX is a new algorithm that integrates clinical risk factors of fracture and the results of densitometry. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of FRAX in identifying patients that should receive osteoporosis treatment and compare it with other methods of fracture risk assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved a random sample of 94 postmenopausal women, aged 55 to 79 years, who had not been previously treated for osteoporosis (a part of the EPOLOS [European Polish Osteoporosis Study] population recruited from the region of Łódź, Poland). Clinical risk factors were evaluated and densitometry of the femoral neck was performed. Patients were eligible for treatment on the basis of previous osteoporotic fractures, densitometry results, semiquantitative tabular method (SQM) (according to the Osteoporosis Society of Canada Recommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting), and a 10-year fracture risk (calculated with the British FRAX tool, using different thresholds). RESULTS: Using the FRAX method, between 5.2% to 52% of the examined women would be eligible for treatment, depending on the threshold applied. If the treatment decision was based on a history of vertebral fractures, 4.2% of women would be eligible for treatment, and if other fractures were considered - 20.2%. If the decision was based on densitometry results, 8.5% of women would be eligible for treatment. We observed a high fracture risk in 7%, moderate risk in 19%, and low risk in 74% of women examined by the SQM. CONCLUSIONS: Proper use of FRAX in Poland requires determination of the intervention threshold. Use of FRAX changes the demographic profile of women eligible for therapy, increasing their number in older age groups.

Key concepts: FRAX, Medicine, Osteoporosis, Densitometry, Femoral neck, Postmenopausal women, Hip fracture, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of selected methods for fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women. Analysis of the Łódź population in the EPOLOS study — Research Paper | ScholarLens