Would FRAX Define the High Fracture Risk if the Patients Were Evaluated the Day before Hip Fracture?
Figen Koçyiğit, Merve Acar, Meltem Baydar, Ersin Kuyucu, Ali Koçyiğit
Abstract
Figen Koçyiğit, Merve Acar, Meltem Baydar, Ersin Kuyucu, Ali Koçyiğit
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks in patients with a recent hip fracture. Material and Methods: The study population comprised 58 patients (32 male and 26 female, mean age 79.1 years) with a recent hip fracture. A bedside questionnaire including fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®) variables and fall frequency was administered to the patients. The FRAX® 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to compare different age groups (60–69 years, 70–79 years, and ≥80 years). Results: The mean 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were 13.9% and 78%, respectively. If the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines were taken into account according to major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks using FRAX® the day before the fracture, treatment would not be initiated in 75.8% and 18.9% of patients, respectively. There were significant differences between the age groups according to the 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture probability and fall frequency (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.005, respectively). Conclusion: In our study group, the FRAX® 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability had an underestimation in younger patients with a history of frequent falling and did not seem to improve the definition of high-risk patients. The 10-year probability of hip fracture by the FRAX® tool can classify populations at risk more effectively.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks in patients with a recent hip fracture. Material and Methods: The study population comprised 58 patients (32 male and 26 female, mean age 79.1 years) with a recent hip fracture. A bedside questionnaire including fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®) variables and fall frequency was administered to the patients. The FRAX® 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to compare different age groups (60–69 years, 70–79 years, and ≥80 years). Results: The mean 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks were 13.9% and 78%, respectively. If the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidelines were taken into account according to major osteoporotic and hip fracture risks using FRAX® the day before the fracture, treatment would not be initiated in 75.8% and 18.9% of patients, respectively. There were significant differences between the age groups according to the 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture probability and fall frequency (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.005, respectively). Conclusion: In our study group, the FRAX® 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability had an underestimation in younger patients with a history of frequent falling and did not seem to improve the definition of high-risk patients. The 10-year probability of hip fracture by the FRAX® tool can classify populations at risk more effectively.
Key concepts: FRAX, Hip fracture, Medicine, Fracture (geology), Osteoporotic fracture, Physical therapy, Osteoporosis, Internal medicine