2014PubMedRequires access

[Comparison fracture risk calculated by FRAX tool].

Sebastión Carranza-Lira, María Cristina Lanuza-López, Martha Patricia Sandoval-Barragán

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The FRAX tool allows calculate the 10 year probability of fracture risk in men and women. OBJECTIVE: To compare the 10 years fracture risk calculated with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, open a comparative study was done with 40-80-year-old women, who were evaluated with bone densitometry. To calculate the fracture risk the FRAX tool was used with and without bone densitometry in each patient. Both results were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.2 ± 8.7 years. The median of the FRAX calculated risks without using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.4 (1-12) and hip 0.3 (0-5.2). The calculated risks using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.3 (1.2-11) and for hip 0.2 (0-3.6), without statistically significant differences among them. The calculated T score with FRAX was -1.0 (-2.7 ± 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry were similar. These findings will allow using this instrument in a greater number of patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The FRAX tool allows calculate the 10 year probability of fracture risk in men and women. OBJECTIVE: To compare the 10 years fracture risk calculated with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, open a comparative study was done with 40-80-year-old women, who were evaluated with bone densitometry. To calculate the fracture risk the FRAX tool was used with and without bone densitometry in each patient. Both results were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.2 ± 8.7 years. The median of the FRAX calculated risks without using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.4 (1-12) and hip 0.3 (0-5.2). The calculated risks using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.3 (1.2-11) and for hip 0.2 (0-3.6), without statistically significant differences among them. The calculated T score with FRAX was -1.0 (-2.7 ± 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry were similar. These findings will allow using this instrument in a greater number of patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The FRAX tool allows calculate the 10 year probability of fracture risk in men and women. OBJECTIVE: To compare the 10 years fracture risk calculated with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, open a comparative study was done with 40-80-year-old women, who were evaluated with bone densitometry. To calculate the fracture risk the FRAX tool was used with and without bone densitometry in each patient. Both results were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.2 ± 8.7 years. The median of the FRAX calculated risks without using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.4 (1-12) and hip 0.3 (0-5.2). The calculated risks using bone densitometry was for major fracture 2.3 (1.2-11) and for hip 0.2 (0-3.6), without statistically significant differences among them. The calculated T score with FRAX was -1.0 (-2.7 ± 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the FRAX tool using or not bone densitometry were similar. These findings will allow using this instrument in a greater number of patients.

Key concepts: FRAX, Densitometry, Medicine, Hip fracture, Bone density, Osteoporosis, Dentistry, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison fracture risk calculated by FRAX tool]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens