2010International journal of nursingRequires access

Study on the application of peripheral inserted central catheters for patients with chemotherapy

Meiping Li, Jianming Chen, Lian Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical application of peripheral inserted central catheters (PICC) and under collarbone central venous catheter (CVC) for patients with malignant tumor. Methods 36 patients who were punctured PICC were selected as PICC (A) group. 32 patients who were punctured under collarbone CVC were CVC (B) group. The successful rate of tuber insertion, operation time, retain time and side - reaction for the two group were recorded and evaluated. Results The success rate of insertion of group A was 91.67%, and group B was 78. 13%. The mean time of puncture of group A was ( 11.89 + 1.06) min, group B was (22. 46 + 2. 83 )min. The retain time of group A was ( 65.90 + 5.92) d, group B was ( 39. 31 + 3. 33 ) d only. Moreover the incidence of side reaction of group A was 8. 33%, and group B was 18.75%. There were significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions PICC is superior in successful rate, time and manpower saving, lower complication and retain time. And more secure and convenient for the patients with malignant tumor needed for long time transfusion. It is worth for extending in clinical application. Key words: Peripheral inserted central catheters; Under collarbone central venous catheter; Nursing; Chemotherapy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical application of peripheral inserted central catheters (PICC) and under collarbone central venous catheter (CVC) for patients with malignant tumor. Methods 36 patients who were punctured PICC were selected as PICC (A) group. 32 patients who were punctured under collarbone CVC were CVC (B) group. The successful rate of tuber insertion, operation time, retain time and side - reaction for the two group were recorded and evaluated. Results The success rate of insertion of group A was 91.67%, and group B was 78. 13%. The mean time of puncture of group A was ( 11.89 + 1.06) min, group B was (22. 46 + 2. 83 )min. The retain time of group A was ( 65.90 + 5.92) d, group B was ( 39. 31 + 3. 33 ) d only. Moreover the incidence of side reaction of group A was 8. 33%, and group B was 18.75%. There were significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions PICC is superior in successful rate, time and manpower saving, lower complication and retain time. And more secure and convenient for the patients with malignant tumor needed for long time transfusion. It is worth for extending in clinical application. Key words: Peripheral inserted central catheters; Under collarbone central venous catheter; Nursing; Chemotherapy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical application of peripheral inserted central catheters (PICC) and under collarbone central venous catheter (CVC) for patients with malignant tumor. Methods 36 patients who were punctured PICC were selected as PICC (A) group. 32 patients who were punctured under collarbone CVC were CVC (B) group. The successful rate of tuber insertion, operation time, retain time and side - reaction for the two group were recorded and evaluated. Results The success rate of insertion of group A was 91.67%, and group B was 78. 13%. The mean time of puncture of group A was ( 11.89 + 1.06) min, group B was (22. 46 + 2. 83 )min. The retain time of group A was ( 65.90 + 5.92) d, group B was ( 39. 31 + 3. 33 ) d only. Moreover the incidence of side reaction of group A was 8. 33%, and group B was 18.75%. There were significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions PICC is superior in successful rate, time and manpower saving, lower complication and retain time. And more secure and convenient for the patients with malignant tumor needed for long time transfusion. It is worth for extending in clinical application. Key words: Peripheral inserted central catheters; Under collarbone central venous catheter; Nursing; Chemotherapy

Key concepts: Medicine, Peripherally inserted central catheter, Peripheral, Group B, Central venous catheter, Complication, Catheter, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study on the application of peripheral inserted central catheters for patients with chemotherapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens