Greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate versus transurethral prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Jia Yang
Abstract
Jia Yang
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of greenlight photo-selective vaporization of prostate(PVP) and transurethral prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods 178 patients with BPH were randomized into two groups treated either by PVP(95 cases) or by transurethral prostatectomy(83 cases).Various parameters such as operation time,blood loss and complications were recorded and analyzed.Results Average operation time of the PVP group was(47.4±5.1) min,which was less than that of the TURP group,(61.7±6.2) min.The blood loss,blood transfusion,bladder irrigating time,indwelling catheterization time,postoperative hospital day and short-term complication rate in the PVP group was significantly less or shorter than that in the TURP group.The IPSS,QOL,uroflowmery rate,postvoid residual urine volume(RUV) of both groups were significantly improved compared with preoperative data.Conclusions PVP is a safe,effective and minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of BPH,which has the advantages of shorter operation time,less blood loss,faster recovery and few complications.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of greenlight photo-selective vaporization of prostate(PVP) and transurethral prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods 178 patients with BPH were randomized into two groups treated either by PVP(95 cases) or by transurethral prostatectomy(83 cases).Various parameters such as operation time,blood loss and complications were recorded and analyzed.Results Average operation time of the PVP group was(47.4±5.1) min,which was less than that of the TURP group,(61.7±6.2) min.The blood loss,blood transfusion,bladder irrigating time,indwelling catheterization time,postoperative hospital day and short-term complication rate in the PVP group was significantly less or shorter than that in the TURP group.The IPSS,QOL,uroflowmery rate,postvoid residual urine volume(RUV) of both groups were significantly improved compared with preoperative data.Conclusions PVP is a safe,effective and minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of BPH,which has the advantages of shorter operation time,less blood loss,faster recovery and few complications.
Key concepts: Medicine, Urology, Hyperplasia, Blood loss, Prostate, Prostatectomy, Blood transfusion, Transurethral resection of the prostate