2006•Journal of Clinical UrologyRequires access

Greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate versus suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Cui-e Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of different surgical methods of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods:Sixty patients with BPH were randomized into two groups treated by either PVP or open prostatectomy. Various parameters such as operation time, blood loss and complications were recorded and analysied.Results:The IPSS, QOL, uroflowmery, postvoid residual urine volume (RUV) were significantly improved if compared with preoperative data (P 0.05). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective sympotoms and objective results has been noted with the different procedures(P 0.05). Average operation time( 48.6± 15.2 min), blood loss( 58.7± 12.4 ml), bladder irrigating time( 1.2± 0.8 d), indwelling catheterzation( 1.8± 0.5 d), postoperative hospital( 4.5± 1.2 d)and short-term complication rates in PVP were significant shorter than those in open prostatectomy(P 0.05).Conclusions:The PVP has similar therapeutic effect as open prostatectomy for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. PVP is regarded as shorter operative and recovering time, minimally invasive procedure, less blood loss and complication for the patients with BPH.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of different surgical methods of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods:Sixty patients with BPH were randomized into two groups treated by either PVP or open prostatectomy. Various parameters such as operation time, blood loss and complications were recorded and analysied.Results:The IPSS, QOL, uroflowmery, postvoid residual urine volume (RUV) were significantly improved if compared with preoperative data (P 0.05). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective sympotoms and objective results has been noted with the different procedures(P 0.05). Average operation time( 48.6± 15.2 min), blood loss( 58.7± 12.4 ml), bladder irrigating time( 1.2± 0.8 d), indwelling catheterzation( 1.8± 0.5 d), postoperative hospital( 4.5± 1.2 d)and short-term complication rates in PVP were significant shorter than those in open prostatectomy(P 0.05).Conclusions:The PVP has similar therapeutic effect as open prostatectomy for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. PVP is regarded as shorter operative and recovering time, minimally invasive procedure, less blood loss and complication for the patients with BPH.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of different surgical methods of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods:Sixty patients with BPH were randomized into two groups treated by either PVP or open prostatectomy. Various parameters such as operation time, blood loss and complications were recorded and analysied.Results:The IPSS, QOL, uroflowmery, postvoid residual urine volume (RUV) were significantly improved if compared with preoperative data (P 0.05). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective sympotoms and objective results has been noted with the different procedures(P 0.05). Average operation time( 48.6± 15.2 min), blood loss( 58.7± 12.4 ml), bladder irrigating time( 1.2± 0.8 d), indwelling catheterzation( 1.8± 0.5 d), postoperative hospital( 4.5± 1.2 d)and short-term complication rates in PVP were significant shorter than those in open prostatectomy(P 0.05).Conclusions:The PVP has similar therapeutic effect as open prostatectomy for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. PVP is regarded as shorter operative and recovering time, minimally invasive procedure, less blood loss and complication for the patients with BPH.

Key concepts: Medicine, Open Prostatectomy, Urology, Prostate, Hyperplasia, Blood loss, Prostatectomy, Complication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate versus suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens