2008•China Journal of EndoscopyRequires access

Comparison of transurethral electrovaporization-ablation prostatectomy and greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Yang Li-jun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the therapeutic effects of transurethral electrovaporization-ablation prostatectomy (TUEVAP) and greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for the treatment on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods 186 symptomatic BPH patients randomly underwent TUEVAP (n = 92) or PVP (n = 94) and the therapeutic effects were evaluated. The operative time,blood loss,indwelling catheterization,subjective symptoms and operative complications were observed. Results IPSS score,QOL,Qmax and PVR in all the patients were significantly improved after either of the procedures (P 0.01). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective symptoms and objective signs was noted for the different procedures (P 0.05). The mean operative time and indwelling catheter time were longer in the TUEVAP group (P 0.01). The intraoperative blood loss and the occurrence of postoperative retreatment,urethral stricture and delayed hemorrhage were more in the TUEVAP group too (P 0.05). Conclusions The therapeutic effect of TUEVAP is similar to PVP′s,but PVP is easier to manipulate with advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,more rapid recovery and fewer complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate and compare the therapeutic effects of transurethral electrovaporization-ablation prostatectomy (TUEVAP) and greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for the treatment on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods 186 symptomatic BPH patients randomly underwent TUEVAP (n = 92) or PVP (n = 94) and the therapeutic effects were evaluated. The operative time,blood loss,indwelling catheterization,subjective symptoms and operative complications were observed. Results IPSS score,QOL,Qmax and PVR in all the patients were significantly improved after either of the procedures (P 0.01). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective symptoms and objective signs was noted for the different procedures (P 0.05). The mean operative time and indwelling catheter time were longer in the TUEVAP group (P 0.01). The intraoperative blood loss and the occurrence of postoperative retreatment,urethral stricture and delayed hemorrhage were more in the TUEVAP group too (P 0.05). Conclusions The therapeutic effect of TUEVAP is similar to PVP′s,but PVP is easier to manipulate with advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,more rapid recovery and fewer complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate and compare the therapeutic effects of transurethral electrovaporization-ablation prostatectomy (TUEVAP) and greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for the treatment on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods 186 symptomatic BPH patients randomly underwent TUEVAP (n = 92) or PVP (n = 94) and the therapeutic effects were evaluated. The operative time,blood loss,indwelling catheterization,subjective symptoms and operative complications were observed. Results IPSS score,QOL,Qmax and PVR in all the patients were significantly improved after either of the procedures (P 0.01). No significant difference in the improvement of subjective symptoms and objective signs was noted for the different procedures (P 0.05). The mean operative time and indwelling catheter time were longer in the TUEVAP group (P 0.01). The intraoperative blood loss and the occurrence of postoperative retreatment,urethral stricture and delayed hemorrhage were more in the TUEVAP group too (P 0.05). Conclusions The therapeutic effect of TUEVAP is similar to PVP′s,but PVP is easier to manipulate with advantages of shorter operative time,less blood loss,more rapid recovery and fewer complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Urology, Blood loss, Hyperplasia, Prostatectomy, Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Open Prostatectomy, Prostate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of transurethral electrovaporization-ablation prostatectomy and greenlight photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia — Research Paper | ScholarLens