2007Journal of Practical Medical TechniquesRequires access

Influence of Pychology Intervention to Advanced Gastric Cancer Patient with Anxiety and Depression

Feng Hua-yang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective Anxiety and depression emotion prevail among Gastric Cancer patients as other tumors.To study the influence of psychology intervention to Advanced Gastric Cancer tumors with anxiety and depression. Methods 92 patients with anxity and depression after Advanced Gastric Cancer were divided into two groups randomly: the Psychological intervention group (44 cases) receivedboth Psychological intervention therapy and routine drug therapy; the control group (48 cases)received only routine drug therapy; the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used as indicators for measuring the results of treatment in two groups patients. Results The SDS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (39.8±4.5 56.8±4.8,P0.01). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (36.7±5.1 59.8±4.9,P0.01). The SDS had no statistical difference between post-therapy patients with pre-therapy patients in the controlled groups(53.4±5.3 57.1±5.6,P0.05). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the the controlled groups(47.7±5.3 60.2±6.8,P0.05). Both SDS and SAS in the controlled groups were significantly higher than the psychology intervention group in post-therapy(P0.05).Conclusion Psychology intervention played an advanced role in whole rehabilitation of Advanced Gastric Cancer patient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective Anxiety and depression emotion prevail among Gastric Cancer patients as other tumors.To study the influence of psychology intervention to Advanced Gastric Cancer tumors with anxiety and depression. Methods 92 patients with anxity and depression after Advanced Gastric Cancer were divided into two groups randomly: the Psychological intervention group (44 cases) receivedboth Psychological intervention therapy and routine drug therapy; the control group (48 cases)received only routine drug therapy; the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used as indicators for measuring the results of treatment in two groups patients. Results The SDS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (39.8±4.5 56.8±4.8,P0.01). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (36.7±5.1 59.8±4.9,P0.01). The SDS had no statistical difference between post-therapy patients with pre-therapy patients in the controlled groups(53.4±5.3 57.1±5.6,P0.05). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the the controlled groups(47.7±5.3 60.2±6.8,P0.05). Both SDS and SAS in the controlled groups were significantly higher than the psychology intervention group in post-therapy(P0.05).Conclusion Psychology intervention played an advanced role in whole rehabilitation of Advanced Gastric Cancer patient.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective Anxiety and depression emotion prevail among Gastric Cancer patients as other tumors.To study the influence of psychology intervention to Advanced Gastric Cancer tumors with anxiety and depression. Methods 92 patients with anxity and depression after Advanced Gastric Cancer were divided into two groups randomly: the Psychological intervention group (44 cases) receivedboth Psychological intervention therapy and routine drug therapy; the control group (48 cases)received only routine drug therapy; the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used as indicators for measuring the results of treatment in two groups patients. Results The SDS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (39.8±4.5 56.8±4.8,P0.01). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the psychology intervention group (36.7±5.1 59.8±4.9,P0.01). The SDS had no statistical difference between post-therapy patients with pre-therapy patients in the controlled groups(53.4±5.3 57.1±5.6,P0.05). The SAS in post-therapy patients was significantly lower than pre-therapy patients in the the controlled groups(47.7±5.3 60.2±6.8,P0.05). Both SDS and SAS in the controlled groups were significantly higher than the psychology intervention group in post-therapy(P0.05).Conclusion Psychology intervention played an advanced role in whole rehabilitation of Advanced Gastric Cancer patient.

Key concepts: Medicine, Depression (economics), Anxiety, Intervention (counseling), Cancer, Internal medicine, Rating scale, Group psychotherapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Pychology Intervention to Advanced Gastric Cancer Patient with Anxiety and Depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens