2009•Journal of Changshu Institute of TechnologyRequires access

Shortcomings of Metonymy Based on Conceptual Contiguity

Tang Ding-junb

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Currently,scholars have focused on the cognitive study of metonymy from the perspective of conceptual contiguity,which is grounded on the traditional structuralist definition of metonymy and regarded as its extension.However,there exist three shortcomings in the study of metonymy from the conceptual contiguity’s perspective.It is unclear whether metonymy is a relationship between entities or between domains and whether metonymy is necessarily connected to an act of reference.Besides,the factors influencing the formation of conventionalized metonymies and novel metonymies remain unexplored.The impacts of cognitive principles and communicative principles on metonymy should not be ignored when metonymy is defined from the angle of conceptual contiguity.Therefore,it is still necessary to further the study of metonymy from this perspective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Currently,scholars have focused on the cognitive study of metonymy from the perspective of conceptual contiguity,which is grounded on the traditional structuralist definition of metonymy and regarded as its extension.However,there exist three shortcomings in the study of metonymy from the conceptual contiguity’s perspective.It is unclear whether metonymy is a relationship between entities or between domains and whether metonymy is necessarily connected to an act of reference.Besides,the factors influencing the formation of conventionalized metonymies and novel metonymies remain unexplored.The impacts of cognitive principles and communicative principles on metonymy should not be ignored when metonymy is defined from the angle of conceptual contiguity.Therefore,it is still necessary to further the study of metonymy from this perspective.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Currently,scholars have focused on the cognitive study of metonymy from the perspective of conceptual contiguity,which is grounded on the traditional structuralist definition of metonymy and regarded as its extension.However,there exist three shortcomings in the study of metonymy from the conceptual contiguity’s perspective.It is unclear whether metonymy is a relationship between entities or between domains and whether metonymy is necessarily connected to an act of reference.Besides,the factors influencing the formation of conventionalized metonymies and novel metonymies remain unexplored.The impacts of cognitive principles and communicative principles on metonymy should not be ignored when metonymy is defined from the angle of conceptual contiguity.Therefore,it is still necessary to further the study of metonymy from this perspective.

Key concepts: Metonymy, Contiguity, Perspective (graphical), Linguistics, Psychology, Cognition, Cognitive linguistics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Shortcomings of Metonymy Based on Conceptual Contiguity — Research Paper | ScholarLens