Some Comments on Liu Xie’sBian Sao (辨骚) in The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons (文心雕龙)
MI Xiao-yan
Abstract
MI Xiao-yan
Abstract
In perspective of stylistics,Liu Xie’s article ofBian Sao(辨骚) in The Literary Mind and Carving ofDragons (文心雕龙) has special significance.It listed Saoas a literary style for the first time.Xiao Tong’s liter ary outlook is remarkably in fluenced by Liu Xie.In his Zhaoming Wenxuan (昭明文选),articles were arranged in order of style.Saoworks was independently arranged in the third place afterFuand poem.Due to Liu Xie’s idea of learning from the classics,theoretical contradictions exists inBian Sao (辨骚).The function of Chu culture and culture of Warring States is insufficiently discussed.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In perspective of stylistics,Liu Xie’s article ofBian Sao(辨骚) in The Literary Mind and Carving ofDragons (文心雕龙) has special significance.It listed Saoas a literary style for the first time.Xiao Tong’s liter ary outlook is remarkably in fluenced by Liu Xie.In his Zhaoming Wenxuan (昭明文选),articles were arranged in order of style.Saoworks was independently arranged in the third place afterFuand poem.Due to Liu Xie’s idea of learning from the classics,theoretical contradictions exists inBian Sao (辨骚).The function of Chu culture and culture of Warring States is insufficiently discussed.
Key concepts: Carving, Style (visual arts), Poetry, Order (exchange), Literature, Philosophy, Writing style, Stylistics