Clinical significance of anti-AB titer of pregnant women with blood group O
WU Wenhe
Abstract
WU Wenhe
Abstract
Objective To detect anti-AB(IgG) in sera of the pregnant women with blood group O whose husbunds' is not O,then to explore its clinical significances.Methods 60 cases male donors with blood group O and 72 cases pregant women with different pregnancy times were detected by micro-column gel test(MGT).Results The positive rate of the male doners group were 18.3%(11/60).What was necessarily metioned was the rates were zero when their anti-A(IgG) or anti-B(IgG) less than 512 in sera;It was 52.8%(38/72) in the pregnant women group(in which,first-time pregnancy group was 47.4%,non-first-time pregnancy group was 58.8%).Statistics results indicated there were significant difference between male donors group and the pregnant women group(P0.01). Conclusion It was possible that there were relations between anti-AB(IgG) and pregnancy,and the latter(include abortion) could cause the former increase.There maybe were feasibilities to predict HDN or blood group for fetuses by dynamic detection of anti-AB(IgG).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To detect anti-AB(IgG) in sera of the pregnant women with blood group O whose husbunds' is not O,then to explore its clinical significances.Methods 60 cases male donors with blood group O and 72 cases pregant women with different pregnancy times were detected by micro-column gel test(MGT).Results The positive rate of the male doners group were 18.3%(11/60).What was necessarily metioned was the rates were zero when their anti-A(IgG) or anti-B(IgG) less than 512 in sera;It was 52.8%(38/72) in the pregnant women group(in which,first-time pregnancy group was 47.4%,non-first-time pregnancy group was 58.8%).Statistics results indicated there were significant difference between male donors group and the pregnant women group(P0.01). Conclusion It was possible that there were relations between anti-AB(IgG) and pregnancy,and the latter(include abortion) could cause the former increase.There maybe were feasibilities to predict HDN or blood group for fetuses by dynamic detection of anti-AB(IgG).
Key concepts: Titer, Pregnancy, Medicine, Group B, Abortion, Obstetrics, Group A, Fetus