2009Chinese Journal of Optometry & OphthalmologyRequires access

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different instruments

Xian Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the difference in central corneal thickness(CCT) measurements using a Pentacam,an Orb-scan-Ⅱ topography system and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.Methods The CCTs of 252 healthy eyes(from 126 myopic subjects) were measured with a Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences between the instruments were evaluated with paired t-tests.The correlation between the measurements was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients.Results Of the 252 eyes,the CCT values obtained with the Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were(546.3±33.6) μm,(550.5±38.5)μm and(538.6±35.4)μm,respectively.There was a high correlation among them.The CCT values obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were the lowest among the three mea-surements.This sample(252 eyes) was divided into 3 groups according to the CCT measurements obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.In group 1,71 eyes had CCT values less than 520 μm.The CCT values with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were thin-ner than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P =0.000,P =0.001).There were no statistically significant differences between Orbscan-Ⅱ and Pentacam measurements.In group 2,154 eyes had CCT values from 520 μm to 580 μm.The CCT values obtained with an Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam and the CCT values with a Pentacam were thicker than those ob-tained with an A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).In group 3,27 eyes had CCT values of more than 580 μm.The CCT values with Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).There were no statistically significant differences between A-scan ultrasound pachymetry and Pentacam.Conclusion Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably when measuring central corneal thickness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the difference in central corneal thickness(CCT) measurements using a Pentacam,an Orb-scan-Ⅱ topography system and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.Methods The CCTs of 252 healthy eyes(from 126 myopic subjects) were measured with a Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences between the instruments were evaluated with paired t-tests.The correlation between the measurements was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients.Results Of the 252 eyes,the CCT values obtained with the Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were(546.3±33.6) μm,(550.5±38.5)μm and(538.6±35.4)μm,respectively.There was a high correlation among them.The CCT values obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were the lowest among the three mea-surements.This sample(252 eyes) was divided into 3 groups according to the CCT measurements obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.In group 1,71 eyes had CCT values less than 520 μm.The CCT values with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were thin-ner than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P =0.000,P =0.001).There were no statistically significant differences between Orbscan-Ⅱ and Pentacam measurements.In group 2,154 eyes had CCT values from 520 μm to 580 μm.The CCT values obtained with an Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam and the CCT values with a Pentacam were thicker than those ob-tained with an A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).In group 3,27 eyes had CCT values of more than 580 μm.The CCT values with Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).There were no statistically significant differences between A-scan ultrasound pachymetry and Pentacam.Conclusion Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably when measuring central corneal thickness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the difference in central corneal thickness(CCT) measurements using a Pentacam,an Orb-scan-Ⅱ topography system and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.Methods The CCTs of 252 healthy eyes(from 126 myopic subjects) were measured with a Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences between the instruments were evaluated with paired t-tests.The correlation between the measurements was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients.Results Of the 252 eyes,the CCT values obtained with the Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were(546.3±33.6) μm,(550.5±38.5)μm and(538.6±35.4)μm,respectively.There was a high correlation among them.The CCT values obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were the lowest among the three mea-surements.This sample(252 eyes) was divided into 3 groups according to the CCT measurements obtained with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.In group 1,71 eyes had CCT values less than 520 μm.The CCT values with A-scan ultrasound pachymetry were thin-ner than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P =0.000,P =0.001).There were no statistically significant differences between Orbscan-Ⅱ and Pentacam measurements.In group 2,154 eyes had CCT values from 520 μm to 580 μm.The CCT values obtained with an Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam and the CCT values with a Pentacam were thicker than those ob-tained with an A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).In group 3,27 eyes had CCT values of more than 580 μm.The CCT values with Orbscan-Ⅱ were thicker than those obtained with a Pentacam or A-scan ultrasound pachymetry.The differences were significant(P=0.000,P=0.000).There were no statistically significant differences between A-scan ultrasound pachymetry and Pentacam.Conclusion Pentacam,Orbscan-Ⅱ and A-scan ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably when measuring central corneal thickness.

Key concepts: Ophthalmology, Ultrasound, Significant difference, Medicine, Positive correlation, Optometry, Radiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different instruments — Research Paper | ScholarLens