2005Chinese New Drugs JournalRequires access

Effect of irbesartan versus enalapril in treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension

Wenzhen Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To assess the effect of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.Methods:A randomized,single-blind parallel arm clinical study enrolled 70 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP)90 mmHg,who were randomly 1∶1 to receive either irbesartan 150 mg once daily or enalapril 10 mg once daily for 8 weeks after one-week wash out period.At the end of the 4-week of the therapy,hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day was added onto the patients who still had a SDBP more than 90 mmHg.Results:Irbesartan vs.enalapril significantly reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure(SSBP) and SDBP of 12.0% vs.12.3% and 15.5% vs.13.9%,respectively.The efficacy rate of irbesartan and enalapril was 73.5% vs.67.6%(P0.05).The incidence rate of overall adverse events showed no statistical difference in both groups except cough(14% for enalapril vs.3% for irbesartan).Conclusion:Irbesartan was therapeutically equivalent to enalapril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To assess the effect of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.Methods:A randomized,single-blind parallel arm clinical study enrolled 70 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP)90 mmHg,who were randomly 1∶1 to receive either irbesartan 150 mg once daily or enalapril 10 mg once daily for 8 weeks after one-week wash out period.At the end of the 4-week of the therapy,hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day was added onto the patients who still had a SDBP more than 90 mmHg.Results:Irbesartan vs.enalapril significantly reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure(SSBP) and SDBP of 12.0% vs.12.3% and 15.5% vs.13.9%,respectively.The efficacy rate of irbesartan and enalapril was 73.5% vs.67.6%(P0.05).The incidence rate of overall adverse events showed no statistical difference in both groups except cough(14% for enalapril vs.3% for irbesartan).Conclusion:Irbesartan was therapeutically equivalent to enalapril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To assess the effect of irbesartan versus enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.Methods:A randomized,single-blind parallel arm clinical study enrolled 70 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP)90 mmHg,who were randomly 1∶1 to receive either irbesartan 150 mg once daily or enalapril 10 mg once daily for 8 weeks after one-week wash out period.At the end of the 4-week of the therapy,hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day was added onto the patients who still had a SDBP more than 90 mmHg.Results:Irbesartan vs.enalapril significantly reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure(SSBP) and SDBP of 12.0% vs.12.3% and 15.5% vs.13.9%,respectively.The efficacy rate of irbesartan and enalapril was 73.5% vs.67.6%(P0.05).The incidence rate of overall adverse events showed no statistical difference in both groups except cough(14% for enalapril vs.3% for irbesartan).Conclusion:Irbesartan was therapeutically equivalent to enalapril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Key concepts: Irbesartan, Enalapril, Hydrochlorothiazide, Medicine, Blood pressure, Essential hypertension, Internal medicine, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of irbesartan versus enalapril in treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens