2004•Yiyao daobaoRequires access

Comparison of Cost-effectiveness between Ofloxacin and Fleroxcin in Treatment of Lower Respiratory Infection

Xu Xiao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects and costs between ofloxacin and fleroxacin on patients with lower respiratory infection. Methods:The patients with lower respiratory infection were randomized into two groups: group one received ofloxain, and group two received fleroxcin. Pharmacoeconomy evaluation was performed by minimized cost analysis. Results:The effective rates of group one and group two were 85.71% and 90.00%, the adverse reaction rates were 10.71% and 10.00%(P 0.05), and the expenditures 960.50 yuan and 2 231.25 yuan, respectively. Conclusion:By the cost-effectiveness analysis ofloxacin is better than that of fleroxcin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects and costs between ofloxacin and fleroxacin on patients with lower respiratory infection. Methods:The patients with lower respiratory infection were randomized into two groups: group one received ofloxain, and group two received fleroxcin. Pharmacoeconomy evaluation was performed by minimized cost analysis. Results:The effective rates of group one and group two were 85.71% and 90.00%, the adverse reaction rates were 10.71% and 10.00%(P 0.05), and the expenditures 960.50 yuan and 2 231.25 yuan, respectively. Conclusion:By the cost-effectiveness analysis ofloxacin is better than that of fleroxcin.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects and costs between ofloxacin and fleroxacin on patients with lower respiratory infection. Methods:The patients with lower respiratory infection were randomized into two groups: group one received ofloxain, and group two received fleroxcin. Pharmacoeconomy evaluation was performed by minimized cost analysis. Results:The effective rates of group one and group two were 85.71% and 90.00%, the adverse reaction rates were 10.71% and 10.00%(P 0.05), and the expenditures 960.50 yuan and 2 231.25 yuan, respectively. Conclusion:By the cost-effectiveness analysis ofloxacin is better than that of fleroxcin.

Key concepts: Fleroxacin, Ofloxacin, Medicine, Adverse effect, Internal medicine, Respiratory system, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost effectiveness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Cost-effectiveness between Ofloxacin and Fleroxcin in Treatment of Lower Respiratory Infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens