2010Unpublished venueRequires access

The diagnostic Value of Three Methods Among autoimmune diseases

Zheng Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study more significant detective combination by comparing three methods of antinuclear antibody, extractable nuclear antigen and antinuclear antibodies 3.Methods Three methods were adopted as follows:detecting antinuclear antibody with HEP-2 and prime hepar as antigen media,determining extractable nuclear antigen by EUROASSAY including nRNP/Sm、Sm、SSA、SSB、Scl-70 and Jo-1,using crithidia luciliae as antigen,to detect ds-DNA antibody with indirect immunofluorescence assay,and to study 15 autoantibodies by EUROLINE.Results To compare positive rates of three dilution(1:10, 1:80,1:100) in ANA detection,there existed significant difference(P0.01) between two dilution of 1:10 and 1.80 only,.In the detection of multiple nuclear types(cytoplasmic pattern,centromere pattern and homegeneous pattern etc),the positive rate of antinucleatr antibodies 3 was higer than that of ENA.IIF was prior to the EUROLINE in the detection of ds-DNA.Conclusion During detecting ANA with IIF,the dilution of 1:80 has advantages in raising positive rate,and ANA3 of 15 antigens provides facilities for clinical diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study more significant detective combination by comparing three methods of antinuclear antibody, extractable nuclear antigen and antinuclear antibodies 3.Methods Three methods were adopted as follows:detecting antinuclear antibody with HEP-2 and prime hepar as antigen media,determining extractable nuclear antigen by EUROASSAY including nRNP/Sm、Sm、SSA、SSB、Scl-70 and Jo-1,using crithidia luciliae as antigen,to detect ds-DNA antibody with indirect immunofluorescence assay,and to study 15 autoantibodies by EUROLINE.Results To compare positive rates of three dilution(1:10, 1:80,1:100) in ANA detection,there existed significant difference(P0.01) between two dilution of 1:10 and 1.80 only,.In the detection of multiple nuclear types(cytoplasmic pattern,centromere pattern and homegeneous pattern etc),the positive rate of antinucleatr antibodies 3 was higer than that of ENA.IIF was prior to the EUROLINE in the detection of ds-DNA.Conclusion During detecting ANA with IIF,the dilution of 1:80 has advantages in raising positive rate,and ANA3 of 15 antigens provides facilities for clinical diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study more significant detective combination by comparing three methods of antinuclear antibody, extractable nuclear antigen and antinuclear antibodies 3.Methods Three methods were adopted as follows:detecting antinuclear antibody with HEP-2 and prime hepar as antigen media,determining extractable nuclear antigen by EUROASSAY including nRNP/Sm、Sm、SSA、SSB、Scl-70 and Jo-1,using crithidia luciliae as antigen,to detect ds-DNA antibody with indirect immunofluorescence assay,and to study 15 autoantibodies by EUROLINE.Results To compare positive rates of three dilution(1:10, 1:80,1:100) in ANA detection,there existed significant difference(P0.01) between two dilution of 1:10 and 1.80 only,.In the detection of multiple nuclear types(cytoplasmic pattern,centromere pattern and homegeneous pattern etc),the positive rate of antinucleatr antibodies 3 was higer than that of ENA.IIF was prior to the EUROLINE in the detection of ds-DNA.Conclusion During detecting ANA with IIF,the dilution of 1:80 has advantages in raising positive rate,and ANA3 of 15 antigens provides facilities for clinical diagnosis.

Key concepts: Anti-nuclear antibody, IIf, Extractable nuclear antigens, Antigen, Autoantibody, Antibody, Indirect immunofluorescence, Counterimmunoelectrophoresis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The diagnostic Value of Three Methods Among autoimmune diseases — Research Paper | ScholarLens