2005Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive NeurosurgeryRequires access

Endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms: report of 88 cases

Ping Hong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To summarize the experiences of endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms, emphatically discuss the techniques, complications and the preventions. Methods Ninety aneurysms in 88 patients were treated by detachable coil embolization. Among them, 28 cases were treated by GDC, 18 by DCS, and 42 by EDC. Results Seventy aneurysms were 100% occluded, 13 were 90%~95% occluded, and 5 were 80% occluded. The complications associated- operation occurred in 9 patients. The coil escaping from the sac of aneurysm into its parent artery was seen in 3 patients. Four patients suffered form rerupture of aneurysm during the operation. Serious vasospasm was seen in 2 patients. Two patients died of complications. Conclusions The endovascular embolization is a safe, effective and minimally invasive method for treating intracranial aneurysms. Choosing exact embolization techniques is very important to improve the therapeutic effect and decrease the complications of embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To summarize the experiences of endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms, emphatically discuss the techniques, complications and the preventions. Methods Ninety aneurysms in 88 patients were treated by detachable coil embolization. Among them, 28 cases were treated by GDC, 18 by DCS, and 42 by EDC. Results Seventy aneurysms were 100% occluded, 13 were 90%~95% occluded, and 5 were 80% occluded. The complications associated- operation occurred in 9 patients. The coil escaping from the sac of aneurysm into its parent artery was seen in 3 patients. Four patients suffered form rerupture of aneurysm during the operation. Serious vasospasm was seen in 2 patients. Two patients died of complications. Conclusions The endovascular embolization is a safe, effective and minimally invasive method for treating intracranial aneurysms. Choosing exact embolization techniques is very important to improve the therapeutic effect and decrease the complications of embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To summarize the experiences of endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms, emphatically discuss the techniques, complications and the preventions. Methods Ninety aneurysms in 88 patients were treated by detachable coil embolization. Among them, 28 cases were treated by GDC, 18 by DCS, and 42 by EDC. Results Seventy aneurysms were 100% occluded, 13 were 90%~95% occluded, and 5 were 80% occluded. The complications associated- operation occurred in 9 patients. The coil escaping from the sac of aneurysm into its parent artery was seen in 3 patients. Four patients suffered form rerupture of aneurysm during the operation. Serious vasospasm was seen in 2 patients. Two patients died of complications. Conclusions The endovascular embolization is a safe, effective and minimally invasive method for treating intracranial aneurysms. Choosing exact embolization techniques is very important to improve the therapeutic effect and decrease the complications of embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Key concepts: Embolization, Medicine, Aneurysm, Vasospasm, Radiology, Surgery, Endovascular treatment, Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms: report of 88 cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens