2002Di-Si Junyi Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Efficacy of irbesartan and cilazapril on heart fuction in patients with mild to moderate essetial hypertension

Jia Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM To observe and compare efficacy and the effect of irbesartan and cilazapril on heart functions in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. METHODS Sixty patients with mild to moderate hypertension were treated with irbesartan 150~300 mg or cilazapril 2.5~5.0 mgdaily. For 8 weeks, sitting blood pressure, heart rate, echocardiography and laboratory examination of the patients were observed at baseline and post treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS After 8 weeks of treatment, efficacy was achieved in 80.0% of patients in irbesartan group and 73.3% in cilazapril group ( P 0.05). The decrease of sitting blood pressure was significant in both of the two groups ( P 0.01), irbesartan group was more significant ( P 0.05). In two groups, atiral peak filling velocity ( A ) was all decreased ( P 0.01), early peak filling velocity (E) and E/A radio were increased ( P 0.01); there were no statistical differences between irbesartan and cilazapril. Cilazapril administration induced dry coughing (10%) whereas irbesartan did not. CONCLUSION Irbesartan 150~300 mg dialy was effective in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, and can improve heart function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM To observe and compare efficacy and the effect of irbesartan and cilazapril on heart functions in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. METHODS Sixty patients with mild to moderate hypertension were treated with irbesartan 150~300 mg or cilazapril 2.5~5.0 mgdaily. For 8 weeks, sitting blood pressure, heart rate, echocardiography and laboratory examination of the patients were observed at baseline and post treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS After 8 weeks of treatment, efficacy was achieved in 80.0% of patients in irbesartan group and 73.3% in cilazapril group ( P 0.05). The decrease of sitting blood pressure was significant in both of the two groups ( P 0.01), irbesartan group was more significant ( P 0.05). In two groups, atiral peak filling velocity ( A ) was all decreased ( P 0.01), early peak filling velocity (E) and E/A radio were increased ( P 0.01); there were no statistical differences between irbesartan and cilazapril. Cilazapril administration induced dry coughing (10%) whereas irbesartan did not. CONCLUSION Irbesartan 150~300 mg dialy was effective in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, and can improve heart function.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM To observe and compare efficacy and the effect of irbesartan and cilazapril on heart functions in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. METHODS Sixty patients with mild to moderate hypertension were treated with irbesartan 150~300 mg or cilazapril 2.5~5.0 mgdaily. For 8 weeks, sitting blood pressure, heart rate, echocardiography and laboratory examination of the patients were observed at baseline and post treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS After 8 weeks of treatment, efficacy was achieved in 80.0% of patients in irbesartan group and 73.3% in cilazapril group ( P 0.05). The decrease of sitting blood pressure was significant in both of the two groups ( P 0.01), irbesartan group was more significant ( P 0.05). In two groups, atiral peak filling velocity ( A ) was all decreased ( P 0.01), early peak filling velocity (E) and E/A radio were increased ( P 0.01); there were no statistical differences between irbesartan and cilazapril. Cilazapril administration induced dry coughing (10%) whereas irbesartan did not. CONCLUSION Irbesartan 150~300 mg dialy was effective in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension, and can improve heart function.

Key concepts: Irbesartan, Cilazapril, Medicine, Blood pressure, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Essential hypertension, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of irbesartan and cilazapril on heart fuction in patients with mild to moderate essetial hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens