2002•Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Irbesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension

Cai Si-yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irbesartan for Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited. The antihypertensive effects of irbesartan were compared with losartan in double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trials with double-dummy technique. Following a 2 wk placebo lead-in period, 58 patients received irbesartan 75 mg, po, qd and 59 patients received losartan 50 mg, po, qd for 4 wk, then, followed by dose doubling for another 4 wk in those patients with seated diastolic blood pressure≥12 kPa. At the same time, 17 patients taking irbesartan and 14 patients taking losartan received ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring before and after 8 wk treatment. RESULTS: After 8 wk of therapy, there was no significant difference in the efficiency between irbesartan and losartan (83 % vs 78 %, P0.05). The trough to peak ratios for SBP / DBP were calculated as 81 % / 70 % for irbesartan and 75 % / 71 % for losartan. Dizziness was the most common adverse reaction of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in mild to moderate hypertensive patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irbesartan for Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited. The antihypertensive effects of irbesartan were compared with losartan in double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trials with double-dummy technique. Following a 2 wk placebo lead-in period, 58 patients received irbesartan 75 mg, po, qd and 59 patients received losartan 50 mg, po, qd for 4 wk, then, followed by dose doubling for another 4 wk in those patients with seated diastolic blood pressure≥12 kPa. At the same time, 17 patients taking irbesartan and 14 patients taking losartan received ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring before and after 8 wk treatment. RESULTS: After 8 wk of therapy, there was no significant difference in the efficiency between irbesartan and losartan (83 % vs 78 %, P0.05). The trough to peak ratios for SBP / DBP were calculated as 81 % / 70 % for irbesartan and 75 % / 71 % for losartan. Dizziness was the most common adverse reaction of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in mild to moderate hypertensive patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irbesartan for Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited. The antihypertensive effects of irbesartan were compared with losartan in double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trials with double-dummy technique. Following a 2 wk placebo lead-in period, 58 patients received irbesartan 75 mg, po, qd and 59 patients received losartan 50 mg, po, qd for 4 wk, then, followed by dose doubling for another 4 wk in those patients with seated diastolic blood pressure≥12 kPa. At the same time, 17 patients taking irbesartan and 14 patients taking losartan received ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring before and after 8 wk treatment. RESULTS: After 8 wk of therapy, there was no significant difference in the efficiency between irbesartan and losartan (83 % vs 78 %, P0.05). The trough to peak ratios for SBP / DBP were calculated as 81 % / 70 % for irbesartan and 75 % / 71 % for losartan. Dizziness was the most common adverse reaction of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in mild to moderate hypertensive patients.

Key concepts: Irbesartan, Losartan, Medicine, Placebo, Blood pressure, Essential hypertension, Ambulatory blood pressure, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Irbesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens