Irbesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension
Cai Si-yu
Abstract
Cai Si-yu
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irbesartan for Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited. The antihypertensive effects of irbesartan were compared with losartan in double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trials with double-dummy technique. Following a 2 wk placebo lead-in period, 58 patients received irbesartan 75 mg, po, qd and 59 patients received losartan 50 mg, po, qd for 4 wk, then, followed by dose doubling for another 4 wk in those patients with seated diastolic blood pressure≥12 kPa. At the same time, 17 patients taking irbesartan and 14 patients taking losartan received ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring before and after 8 wk treatment. RESULTS: After 8 wk of therapy, there was no significant difference in the efficiency between irbesartan and losartan (83 % vs 78 %, P0.05). The trough to peak ratios for SBP / DBP were calculated as 81 % / 70 % for irbesartan and 75 % / 71 % for losartan. Dizziness was the most common adverse reaction of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in mild to moderate hypertensive patients.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irbesartan for Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were recruited. The antihypertensive effects of irbesartan were compared with losartan in double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trials with double-dummy technique. Following a 2 wk placebo lead-in period, 58 patients received irbesartan 75 mg, po, qd and 59 patients received losartan 50 mg, po, qd for 4 wk, then, followed by dose doubling for another 4 wk in those patients with seated diastolic blood pressure≥12 kPa. At the same time, 17 patients taking irbesartan and 14 patients taking losartan received ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring before and after 8 wk treatment. RESULTS: After 8 wk of therapy, there was no significant difference in the efficiency between irbesartan and losartan (83 % vs 78 %, P0.05). The trough to peak ratios for SBP / DBP were calculated as 81 % / 70 % for irbesartan and 75 % / 71 % for losartan. Dizziness was the most common adverse reaction of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Irbesartan is an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in mild to moderate hypertensive patients.
Key concepts: Irbesartan, Losartan, Medicine, Placebo, Blood pressure, Essential hypertension, Ambulatory blood pressure, Adverse effect