2014•Chinese Journal of Modern Drug ApplicationRequires access

Application value of two different CT scanning methods for diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis

Zheng Xian-pin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of two different CT scanning methods for diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods To analyze 50 cases of CT manifestations of lumbar spondylolysis by routine scan(base-line perpendicular to the pedicle) and angle scan(base-line parallel to the vertebral arch) respctively, including scanning the whole vertebral arch, 3 mm thickness, 3 mm interlayer. Results CT imaging manifestation of lumbar spondylolysis acquired respectively with two kinds of scanning methods were different. Routine scan showed 46 cases of lumbar spondylolysis, 2 cases of suspicious, 2 cases did not see. However, it showed more clearly for deformation, vertebra canal stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression. Angle scan clearly showed that 50 cases with lumbar spondylolysis, lumbar spondylolysis crack width, hyperplasia of hardening and the surrounding bone block, but for stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression were worse than routine scan. Conclusion Two different CT scan methods have advantages and disadvantages in the displaying of lumbar spondylolysis and all secondary change, combined two kinds of scanning methods can, show objectively lumbar spondylolysis and secondary change, which has application value in diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the application value of two different CT scanning methods for diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods To analyze 50 cases of CT manifestations of lumbar spondylolysis by routine scan(base-line perpendicular to the pedicle) and angle scan(base-line parallel to the vertebral arch) respctively, including scanning the whole vertebral arch, 3 mm thickness, 3 mm interlayer. Results CT imaging manifestation of lumbar spondylolysis acquired respectively with two kinds of scanning methods were different. Routine scan showed 46 cases of lumbar spondylolysis, 2 cases of suspicious, 2 cases did not see. However, it showed more clearly for deformation, vertebra canal stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression. Angle scan clearly showed that 50 cases with lumbar spondylolysis, lumbar spondylolysis crack width, hyperplasia of hardening and the surrounding bone block, but for stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression were worse than routine scan. Conclusion Two different CT scan methods have advantages and disadvantages in the displaying of lumbar spondylolysis and all secondary change, combined two kinds of scanning methods can, show objectively lumbar spondylolysis and secondary change, which has application value in diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the application value of two different CT scanning methods for diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods To analyze 50 cases of CT manifestations of lumbar spondylolysis by routine scan(base-line perpendicular to the pedicle) and angle scan(base-line parallel to the vertebral arch) respctively, including scanning the whole vertebral arch, 3 mm thickness, 3 mm interlayer. Results CT imaging manifestation of lumbar spondylolysis acquired respectively with two kinds of scanning methods were different. Routine scan showed 46 cases of lumbar spondylolysis, 2 cases of suspicious, 2 cases did not see. However, it showed more clearly for deformation, vertebra canal stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression. Angle scan clearly showed that 50 cases with lumbar spondylolysis, lumbar spondylolysis crack width, hyperplasia of hardening and the surrounding bone block, but for stenosis, dural sac and nerve root compression were worse than routine scan. Conclusion Two different CT scan methods have advantages and disadvantages in the displaying of lumbar spondylolysis and all secondary change, combined two kinds of scanning methods can, show objectively lumbar spondylolysis and secondary change, which has application value in diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis.

Key concepts: Spondylolysis, Lumbar, Medicine, Pars interarticularis, Lateral recess, Radiology, Lumbar vertebrae, Spondylolisthesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application value of two different CT scanning methods for diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens