2015Unpublished venueRequires access

The Clinical Observation of Optimal Value Traction Method Combine with Traction Recovery Three Steps for Treatment of Nerve Root Type Cervical Spondylosis

Lian Ji

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To observe the curative effect of optimal value traction method combine with traction recovery three steps for treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis. Methods: 70 cases with nerve root type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into the conventional group 34 cases and the combined treatment group 36 cases. The conventional group with neck herbal fumigation, neck massage, neck normal traction therapy, combination therapy using merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment. Nerve root type cervical spondylosis symptoms, signs of integral table, pain visual analogue scale(VAS) as indicators of clinical observation were examined 2weeks around the treatment. Results: Before treatment, the 2 groups was not statistically significant in patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, signs and VAS score between the integral. After 2 weeks treatment, compared 2 groups of patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, symptom integral and the VAS score and before treatment and between groups, the difference had statistical significance. The routine group was 35.3% efficiency, combined therapy group was 58.3% efficiency, combined treatment group curative effect is obviously superior to the conventional treatment group, the difference was statistically significant between the 2 groups. Conclusion: merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis, has short course, rapid effect, to promote the advantages of rapid recovery, is worthy of clinical use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To observe the curative effect of optimal value traction method combine with traction recovery three steps for treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis. Methods: 70 cases with nerve root type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into the conventional group 34 cases and the combined treatment group 36 cases. The conventional group with neck herbal fumigation, neck massage, neck normal traction therapy, combination therapy using merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment. Nerve root type cervical spondylosis symptoms, signs of integral table, pain visual analogue scale(VAS) as indicators of clinical observation were examined 2weeks around the treatment. Results: Before treatment, the 2 groups was not statistically significant in patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, signs and VAS score between the integral. After 2 weeks treatment, compared 2 groups of patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, symptom integral and the VAS score and before treatment and between groups, the difference had statistical significance. The routine group was 35.3% efficiency, combined therapy group was 58.3% efficiency, combined treatment group curative effect is obviously superior to the conventional treatment group, the difference was statistically significant between the 2 groups. Conclusion: merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis, has short course, rapid effect, to promote the advantages of rapid recovery, is worthy of clinical use.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To observe the curative effect of optimal value traction method combine with traction recovery three steps for treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis. Methods: 70 cases with nerve root type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into the conventional group 34 cases and the combined treatment group 36 cases. The conventional group with neck herbal fumigation, neck massage, neck normal traction therapy, combination therapy using merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment. Nerve root type cervical spondylosis symptoms, signs of integral table, pain visual analogue scale(VAS) as indicators of clinical observation were examined 2weeks around the treatment. Results: Before treatment, the 2 groups was not statistically significant in patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, signs and VAS score between the integral. After 2 weeks treatment, compared 2 groups of patients with nerve root type cervical spondylosis clinical symptoms, symptom integral and the VAS score and before treatment and between groups, the difference had statistical significance. The routine group was 35.3% efficiency, combined therapy group was 58.3% efficiency, combined treatment group curative effect is obviously superior to the conventional treatment group, the difference was statistically significant between the 2 groups. Conclusion: merit traction method with lead complex three step treatment of nerve root type cervical spondylosis, has short course, rapid effect, to promote the advantages of rapid recovery, is worthy of clinical use.

Key concepts: Cervical spondylosis, Medicine, Nerve root, Traction (geology), Visual analogue scale, Surgery, Neck pain, Massage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Observation of Optimal Value Traction Method Combine with Traction Recovery Three Steps for Treatment of Nerve Root Type Cervical Spondylosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens