2002Zhonghua xiaohua neijing zazhiRequires access

Multicenter study on gastroscope disinfection and sample survey of automated washer/disinfectors

Zhang Taichang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To select a practical and reliable method in cleaning and disinfecting endo-scope, and to investigate the efficacy of endoscope disinfection. Methods A study was done on the disinfection efficacy using or not using enzyme cleaning plus 2% glutaraldehyde immersion, and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfectors for endoscopes at tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Results In 301 cases of en-doscopes cleaned with enzyme ( Epizyme rapid multi enzyme cleanse) and immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes, culture was negative in 283 cases (94. 02% ) ; in 155 cases without enzyme cleaning but with immersion for 7 minutes in 2% glutaraldehyde, culture was negative in 137 cases (88. 39 % ). Taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, there were 298(99.00% ) and 147(94. 84% ) cases eligible in enzyme treated and enzyme untreated group respectively , P 0.01. Sample survey of cleaning and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfector : (1) Machine I in 35 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes, culture was negative in 4 cases ( 11. 43 % ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 5 cases were eligible (14. 29%). (2) Machine II in 29 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes,culture was negative in 2 cases ( 6. 90% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 6 cases were eligible ( 20.69% ). (3) Machine II in 20 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 6 minutes, culture was negative in 17 cases ( 85. 00% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 18 cases were eligible ( 90. 00% ) . All results of the auto-mated washer/disinfectors fell short of the sterilization standard. Conclusions Thorough cleaning of every part of the endoscope is necessary to ensure disinfection efficacy. The use of enzymes in the cleaning process enhances the cleanness; on that basis, immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes achieves adequate sterilization. The currently employed home made automated washer/disinfector routine method, cleaning and disinfection for 3 or 6 minutes, is insufficient to attain the standard of safe disinfection of endoscope.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To select a practical and reliable method in cleaning and disinfecting endo-scope, and to investigate the efficacy of endoscope disinfection. Methods A study was done on the disinfection efficacy using or not using enzyme cleaning plus 2% glutaraldehyde immersion, and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfectors for endoscopes at tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Results In 301 cases of en-doscopes cleaned with enzyme ( Epizyme rapid multi enzyme cleanse) and immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes, culture was negative in 283 cases (94. 02% ) ; in 155 cases without enzyme cleaning but with immersion for 7 minutes in 2% glutaraldehyde, culture was negative in 137 cases (88. 39 % ). Taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, there were 298(99.00% ) and 147(94. 84% ) cases eligible in enzyme treated and enzyme untreated group respectively , P 0.01. Sample survey of cleaning and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfector : (1) Machine I in 35 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes, culture was negative in 4 cases ( 11. 43 % ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 5 cases were eligible (14. 29%). (2) Machine II in 29 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes,culture was negative in 2 cases ( 6. 90% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 6 cases were eligible ( 20.69% ). (3) Machine II in 20 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 6 minutes, culture was negative in 17 cases ( 85. 00% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 18 cases were eligible ( 90. 00% ) . All results of the auto-mated washer/disinfectors fell short of the sterilization standard. Conclusions Thorough cleaning of every part of the endoscope is necessary to ensure disinfection efficacy. The use of enzymes in the cleaning process enhances the cleanness; on that basis, immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes achieves adequate sterilization. The currently employed home made automated washer/disinfector routine method, cleaning and disinfection for 3 or 6 minutes, is insufficient to attain the standard of safe disinfection of endoscope.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To select a practical and reliable method in cleaning and disinfecting endo-scope, and to investigate the efficacy of endoscope disinfection. Methods A study was done on the disinfection efficacy using or not using enzyme cleaning plus 2% glutaraldehyde immersion, and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfectors for endoscopes at tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Results In 301 cases of en-doscopes cleaned with enzyme ( Epizyme rapid multi enzyme cleanse) and immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes, culture was negative in 283 cases (94. 02% ) ; in 155 cases without enzyme cleaning but with immersion for 7 minutes in 2% glutaraldehyde, culture was negative in 137 cases (88. 39 % ). Taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, there were 298(99.00% ) and 147(94. 84% ) cases eligible in enzyme treated and enzyme untreated group respectively , P 0.01. Sample survey of cleaning and disinfection efficacy of automated washer/disinfector : (1) Machine I in 35 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes, culture was negative in 4 cases ( 11. 43 % ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 5 cases were eligible (14. 29%). (2) Machine II in 29 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 3 minutes,culture was negative in 2 cases ( 6. 90% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 6 cases were eligible ( 20.69% ). (3) Machine II in 20 cases, after cleaning and disinfection for 6 minutes, culture was negative in 17 cases ( 85. 00% ) , taking 20 or less bacteria per endoscope as the eligibility criterion, 18 cases were eligible ( 90. 00% ) . All results of the auto-mated washer/disinfectors fell short of the sterilization standard. Conclusions Thorough cleaning of every part of the endoscope is necessary to ensure disinfection efficacy. The use of enzymes in the cleaning process enhances the cleanness; on that basis, immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 7 minutes achieves adequate sterilization. The currently employed home made automated washer/disinfector routine method, cleaning and disinfection for 3 or 6 minutes, is insufficient to attain the standard of safe disinfection of endoscope.

Key concepts: Glutaraldehyde, Medicine, Endoscope, Surgery, Microbiological culture, Bacteria, Pathology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multicenter study on gastroscope disinfection and sample survey of automated washer/disinfectors — Research Paper | ScholarLens