2005Unpublished venueRequires access

“Xing and the Dao of Heaven” difference Between HuHong refutes WangAnShi

Fan Hong-fa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

“xing and the Dao of Heaven ”is always the ground for human cultivation and political governance. Huhong holds that benevolence is the substance and the righteousness is the function and righteousness should be erected according to sentiment while WangAnShi argues that benevolence and righteousness is just a link flows from the “Dao”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

“xing and the Dao of Heaven ”is always the ground for human cultivation and political governance. Huhong holds that benevolence is the substance and the righteousness is the function and righteousness should be erected according to sentiment while WangAnShi argues that benevolence and righteousness is just a link flows from the “Dao”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

“xing and the Dao of Heaven ”is always the ground for human cultivation and political governance. Huhong holds that benevolence is the substance and the righteousness is the function and righteousness should be erected according to sentiment while WangAnShi argues that benevolence and righteousness is just a link flows from the “Dao”.

Key concepts: Righteousness, Heaven, Philosophy, Theology, Politics, Environmental ethics, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Xing and the Dao of Heaven” difference Between HuHong refutes WangAnShi — Research Paper | ScholarLens