2002Journa of Henan Medical UniversityRequires access

Relative bioavailability of gemfibrozil capsules in healthy volunteers

Fengzhi Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of gemfibrozil in 18 young healthy volunteers. Methods:The gemfibrozil concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC after a single oral dose of the standard formulation and the tested formulation were given to 18 volunteers respectively in randomized cross over test. Results:The concentration time curves of two formulations fitted to a one compartment open model.The C max was (45.24±10.15)mg·L -1 and (43.38±9.84)mg·L -1 ; T max was (2.47±0.93)h and (2.25±0.75)h; T 1/2 was (1.59±0.19)h and (1.75±0.29)h; AUC was (165.79±37.79) mg·h·L -1 and (156.39±32.28)mg·h·L -1 ,respectively.The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from our studies showed that there was no significant difference between 2 formulations( P 0.05).The relative bioavailability of the tested formulation was (95.55± 11.45)% (77.03%~119.45%). Conclusion:The results of statistical analysis suggest that the 2 formulations are with bioequivalent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of gemfibrozil in 18 young healthy volunteers. Methods:The gemfibrozil concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC after a single oral dose of the standard formulation and the tested formulation were given to 18 volunteers respectively in randomized cross over test. Results:The concentration time curves of two formulations fitted to a one compartment open model.The C max was (45.24±10.15)mg·L -1 and (43.38±9.84)mg·L -1 ; T max was (2.47±0.93)h and (2.25±0.75)h; T 1/2 was (1.59±0.19)h and (1.75±0.29)h; AUC was (165.79±37.79) mg·h·L -1 and (156.39±32.28)mg·h·L -1 ,respectively.The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from our studies showed that there was no significant difference between 2 formulations( P 0.05).The relative bioavailability of the tested formulation was (95.55± 11.45)% (77.03%~119.45%). Conclusion:The results of statistical analysis suggest that the 2 formulations are with bioequivalent.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of gemfibrozil in 18 young healthy volunteers. Methods:The gemfibrozil concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC after a single oral dose of the standard formulation and the tested formulation were given to 18 volunteers respectively in randomized cross over test. Results:The concentration time curves of two formulations fitted to a one compartment open model.The C max was (45.24±10.15)mg·L -1 and (43.38±9.84)mg·L -1 ; T max was (2.47±0.93)h and (2.25±0.75)h; T 1/2 was (1.59±0.19)h and (1.75±0.29)h; AUC was (165.79±37.79) mg·h·L -1 and (156.39±32.28)mg·h·L -1 ,respectively.The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from our studies showed that there was no significant difference between 2 formulations( P 0.05).The relative bioavailability of the tested formulation was (95.55± 11.45)% (77.03%~119.45%). Conclusion:The results of statistical analysis suggest that the 2 formulations are with bioequivalent.

Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Gemfibrozil, Pharmacokinetics, Plasma concentration, Significant difference, High-performance liquid chromatography, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative bioavailability of gemfibrozil capsules in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens