Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of ribavirin in Chinese healthy volunteers
Xin Tian
Abstract
Xin Tian
Abstract
AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ribavirin in 18 young healthy volunteers. METHODS: The ribavirin concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC after a single oral dose of the standard formulation and the tested formulation which were respectively given to 18 volunteers in randomized cross-over test. RESULTS: The concentration-time curves of three formulations fitted to one-compartment open model. The C_ max were 0.76 ± 0.37 , 0.72 ± 0.22 and 0.76 ± 0.40 mg·L -1 ; T_ max were 2.07 ± 0.89 , 1.67 ± 0.49 and 1.86 ± 0.41 h ; T_ 1/2ke was 22±3, 24±4 and 22± 4 h ; AUC t_0 were 12±4, 14±4 and 12±4 mg·h·L -1 ; and AUC ∞_0 were 16±5, 18±5 and 15±5 mg·h -1 ·L -1 in a standard formulation and two tested formulations, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant difference among three formulations (P 0.05 ). The relative bioavailability of two tested formulations was (112±21) % and (100±18)%. CONCLUSION: The two tested formulations are bioequivalent with referenced formulation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ribavirin in 18 young healthy volunteers. METHODS: The ribavirin concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC after a single oral dose of the standard formulation and the tested formulation which were respectively given to 18 volunteers in randomized cross-over test. RESULTS: The concentration-time curves of three formulations fitted to one-compartment open model. The C_ max were 0.76 ± 0.37 , 0.72 ± 0.22 and 0.76 ± 0.40 mg·L -1 ; T_ max were 2.07 ± 0.89 , 1.67 ± 0.49 and 1.86 ± 0.41 h ; T_ 1/2ke was 22±3, 24±4 and 22± 4 h ; AUC t_0 were 12±4, 14±4 and 12±4 mg·h·L -1 ; and AUC ∞_0 were 16±5, 18±5 and 15±5 mg·h -1 ·L -1 in a standard formulation and two tested formulations, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant difference among three formulations (P 0.05 ). The relative bioavailability of two tested formulations was (112±21) % and (100±18)%. CONCLUSION: The two tested formulations are bioequivalent with referenced formulation.
Key concepts: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence, Pharmacokinetics, Ribavirin, Pharmacology, Plasma concentration, High-performance liquid chromatography, Significant difference