2011•Chinese Computed Medical ImagingRequires access

Value of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Kemin Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose:To investigate the accuracy of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI in staging of rectal cancer,and to analysis the clinical value of both techniques.Methods:Sixty patients with primary rectal cancer,proved by biopsy,were randomly assigned into two groups.They were underwent either 1.5T MRI or 3.0T MRI.MR findings were correlated with histology.Results: The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was 67%,and 94%,40%,56% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively. The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnostic of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was77%,and 83%,60%,100% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively.Conclusion:The accuracy of 1.5TMRI and 3.0TMRI in the diagnosis of T staging is similar.The accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N1 and N2 staging are higher than 1.5T MRI.Both techniques have advantage and have high value in clinical usage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose:To investigate the accuracy of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI in staging of rectal cancer,and to analysis the clinical value of both techniques.Methods:Sixty patients with primary rectal cancer,proved by biopsy,were randomly assigned into two groups.They were underwent either 1.5T MRI or 3.0T MRI.MR findings were correlated with histology.Results: The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was 67%,and 94%,40%,56% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively. The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnostic of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was77%,and 83%,60%,100% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively.Conclusion:The accuracy of 1.5TMRI and 3.0TMRI in the diagnosis of T staging is similar.The accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N1 and N2 staging are higher than 1.5T MRI.Both techniques have advantage and have high value in clinical usage.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose:To investigate the accuracy of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI in staging of rectal cancer,and to analysis the clinical value of both techniques.Methods:Sixty patients with primary rectal cancer,proved by biopsy,were randomly assigned into two groups.They were underwent either 1.5T MRI or 3.0T MRI.MR findings were correlated with histology.Results: The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 1.5T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was 67%,and 94%,40%,56% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively. The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnostic of T staging was 80%.The overall accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N staging was77%,and 83%,60%,100% for N0,N1,and N2 respectively.Conclusion:The accuracy of 1.5TMRI and 3.0TMRI in the diagnosis of T staging is similar.The accuracy of 3.0T MRI in the diagnosis and N1 and N2 staging are higher than 1.5T MRI.Both techniques have advantage and have high value in clinical usage.

Key concepts: Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Colorectal cancer, Diagnostic accuracy, Biopsy, Nuclear medicine, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens