2011Medical Journal of West ChinaRequires access

Contrastive analysis of carotid stenosis imaging

Zhihui Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore contrastive analysis of carotid stenosis imaging.Methods 64 patients with clinically suspected carotid artery stenosis were subject to examination of carotid color doppler ultrasound(Philips-7500 Color Diagnostic Apparatus with Probe Frequency of 3.5-8.0 MHZ) and carotid arteries MRA imaging.All patients were accepted carotid arteriography within two weeks.Results According to the gold standard of carotid arteriography,the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic diagnosis were 96.88% and 35.71%,respectively,and those of MR angiography were 93.75% and 71.43%,respectively.Conclusion The results indicates that the plaque detection rate of color Doppler ultrasound was significantly higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography and the sensitivity of morphological changes in carotid artery wall is higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore contrastive analysis of carotid stenosis imaging.Methods 64 patients with clinically suspected carotid artery stenosis were subject to examination of carotid color doppler ultrasound(Philips-7500 Color Diagnostic Apparatus with Probe Frequency of 3.5-8.0 MHZ) and carotid arteries MRA imaging.All patients were accepted carotid arteriography within two weeks.Results According to the gold standard of carotid arteriography,the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic diagnosis were 96.88% and 35.71%,respectively,and those of MR angiography were 93.75% and 71.43%,respectively.Conclusion The results indicates that the plaque detection rate of color Doppler ultrasound was significantly higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography and the sensitivity of morphological changes in carotid artery wall is higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore contrastive analysis of carotid stenosis imaging.Methods 64 patients with clinically suspected carotid artery stenosis were subject to examination of carotid color doppler ultrasound(Philips-7500 Color Diagnostic Apparatus with Probe Frequency of 3.5-8.0 MHZ) and carotid arteries MRA imaging.All patients were accepted carotid arteriography within two weeks.Results According to the gold standard of carotid arteriography,the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonic diagnosis were 96.88% and 35.71%,respectively,and those of MR angiography were 93.75% and 71.43%,respectively.Conclusion The results indicates that the plaque detection rate of color Doppler ultrasound was significantly higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography and the sensitivity of morphological changes in carotid artery wall is higher than that of MR angiography or carotid arteriography.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stenosis, Radiology, Carotid arteries, Ultrasound, Angiography, Gold standard (test), Color doppler

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contrastive analysis of carotid stenosis imaging — Research Paper | ScholarLens