1993PubMedRequires access

Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.

C Spartera, G Morettini, Gabriele Marino, Letizia Marsili, Ernesto Di Cesare, La Barbera G, C. Petrassi, M Ventura

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and duplex scanning with 2D-Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to evaluate the accuracy of MRA in determining carotid stenosis. All three methods were applied to 101 carotid arteries in 51 patients. Diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery was categorized as follows: 0 to 39%, 40% to 59%, 60% to 94%, 95% to 99%, and occlusion (100%). All images were read in blind fashion by different physicians. DSA is still considered the "gold standard" investigation. In 78 arteries the degree of stenosis according to MRA correlated exactly with that of conventional angiography. In the remaining 23, carotid arteries MRA upgraded the stenosis in 13 and downgraded it in 8. The principal problem is the overestimation of the lesion, which was particularly revealing in lesions of more than 60%. Furthermore to date MRA is not able to evaluate the presence of ulceration. For this reason 2D-MRA alone is not a reliable method for evaluating the presence of carotid artery stenosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and duplex scanning with 2D-Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to evaluate the accuracy of MRA in determining carotid stenosis. All three methods were applied to 101 carotid arteries in 51 patients. Diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery was categorized as follows: 0 to 39%, 40% to 59%, 60% to 94%, 95% to 99%, and occlusion (100%). All images were read in blind fashion by different physicians. DSA is still considered the "gold standard" investigation. In 78 arteries the degree of stenosis according to MRA correlated exactly with that of conventional angiography. In the remaining 23, carotid arteries MRA upgraded the stenosis in 13 and downgraded it in 8. The principal problem is the overestimation of the lesion, which was particularly revealing in lesions of more than 60%. Furthermore to date MRA is not able to evaluate the presence of ulceration. For this reason 2D-MRA alone is not a reliable method for evaluating the presence of carotid artery stenosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and duplex scanning with 2D-Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) to evaluate the accuracy of MRA in determining carotid stenosis. All three methods were applied to 101 carotid arteries in 51 patients. Diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery was categorized as follows: 0 to 39%, 40% to 59%, 60% to 94%, 95% to 99%, and occlusion (100%). All images were read in blind fashion by different physicians. DSA is still considered the "gold standard" investigation. In 78 arteries the degree of stenosis according to MRA correlated exactly with that of conventional angiography. In the remaining 23, carotid arteries MRA upgraded the stenosis in 13 and downgraded it in 8. The principal problem is the overestimation of the lesion, which was particularly revealing in lesions of more than 60%. Furthermore to date MRA is not able to evaluate the presence of ulceration. For this reason 2D-MRA alone is not a reliable method for evaluating the presence of carotid artery stenosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stenosis, Digital subtraction angiography, Duplex scanning, Radiology, Magnetic resonance angiography, Angiography, Carotid arteries

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography. — Research Paper | ScholarLens