2010•Zhongguo yixue wulixue zazhiRequires access

Dosimetric Comparison of Inverse Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Non-Ssmall Cell Lung Cancer

Zheng Ming-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare inverse three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(Inv 3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods:For a cohort of 10 patients,Inv 3D-CRT and three groups of IMRT plannings were designed for per patient. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/2 Gy/30f,95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Dose was computed with a commercially available TPS using convolution/superposition(CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to the PTV95/V20 ratio(PTV95/V20) and Dmax-Dmin. Results:Compared with Inv 3D-CRT,the PTV95/V20 ratio of three groups of IMRT increased by 1.08(P = 0.014) ,0.72(P = 0.089) and 0.42(P = 0.318) ,respectively. Conclusions:For NSCLC,IMRT can reduce the dose to the lungs compared with inverse 3D-CRT by improving the conformity of the plan and is worth spreading in clinical work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare inverse three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(Inv 3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods:For a cohort of 10 patients,Inv 3D-CRT and three groups of IMRT plannings were designed for per patient. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/2 Gy/30f,95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Dose was computed with a commercially available TPS using convolution/superposition(CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to the PTV95/V20 ratio(PTV95/V20) and Dmax-Dmin. Results:Compared with Inv 3D-CRT,the PTV95/V20 ratio of three groups of IMRT increased by 1.08(P = 0.014) ,0.72(P = 0.089) and 0.42(P = 0.318) ,respectively. Conclusions:For NSCLC,IMRT can reduce the dose to the lungs compared with inverse 3D-CRT by improving the conformity of the plan and is worth spreading in clinical work.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare inverse three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(Inv 3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods:For a cohort of 10 patients,Inv 3D-CRT and three groups of IMRT plannings were designed for per patient. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy/2 Gy/30f,95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Dose was computed with a commercially available TPS using convolution/superposition(CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to the PTV95/V20 ratio(PTV95/V20) and Dmax-Dmin. Results:Compared with Inv 3D-CRT,the PTV95/V20 ratio of three groups of IMRT increased by 1.08(P = 0.014) ,0.72(P = 0.089) and 0.42(P = 0.318) ,respectively. Conclusions:For NSCLC,IMRT can reduce the dose to the lungs compared with inverse 3D-CRT by improving the conformity of the plan and is worth spreading in clinical work.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Dosimetry, Lung cancer, Radiology, Oncology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dosimetric Comparison of Inverse Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Non-Ssmall Cell Lung Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens