Dosimetric Comparison of Inverse Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Forward Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Ping Wang
Abstract
Ping Wang
Abstract
Objective:To compare inverse three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (Inv 3D-CRT) and forward three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: For a cohort of 10patients, Inv 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT planning was designed. The prescribed dose was 60Gy/2Gy/30f,95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Doses were computed with a commercially available TPS using convolution/superposition (CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis in terms of PTV homogeneity and conformity indices (HI and CI) as well as OARs dose and volume parameters. Results: In terms of HI and CI, no significant difference was observed. Compared with 3D-CRT, no statistically significant differences between Inv 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT in terms of esophagus,heart and normal lung tissue while the maximum dose of cord of Inv 3D-CRT decreased by 7.43%. Conclusions: For NSCLC, Inv 3D-CRT planning reduced the maximum irradiated dose of cord obviously and is worth spreading in clinical work.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare inverse three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (Inv 3D-CRT) and forward three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: For a cohort of 10patients, Inv 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT planning was designed. The prescribed dose was 60Gy/2Gy/30f,95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Doses were computed with a commercially available TPS using convolution/superposition (CS) algorithm. Plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis in terms of PTV homogeneity and conformity indices (HI and CI) as well as OARs dose and volume parameters. Results: In terms of HI and CI, no significant difference was observed. Compared with 3D-CRT, no statistically significant differences between Inv 3D-CRT and 3D-CRT in terms of esophagus,heart and normal lung tissue while the maximum dose of cord of Inv 3D-CRT decreased by 7.43%. Conclusions: For NSCLC, Inv 3D-CRT planning reduced the maximum irradiated dose of cord obviously and is worth spreading in clinical work.
Key concepts: Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Radiation therapy, Dose-volume histogram, Radiation treatment planning, Conformal map, Sagittal plane, Dosimetry