2014•Journal of China-japan Friendship HospitalRequires access

Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Li We

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare dosimetric difference of treatment planning of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT)and intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer(LANSCLC).Methods:Ten LANSCLC patients to be treated by radiotherapy were investigated.3D-CRT and IMRT plannings were designed for each patient.The prescribed dose was 60Gy(2Gy/f×30f),95% of the planning target volume was covered by this dose for each patient.The dose was computed with treatment planning system of Eclipse 10.0 using convolution / superposition algorithm.Two plans were compared according to the homogeneity index(HI)and conformity index(CI)of dosimetry in the planning target volume and the parameters of dose-volume histogram(DVH)in normal tissue.Results:In the terms of CI and HI,IMRT radiotherapy planning was significantly superior to 3D-CRT plan(P0.05),the index of V20 and V30 in normal lung tissue of IMRT planning was significantly superior to the 3D-CRT planning(P0.05).There were no significant differences between the MLD and V15 in two kinds of planning,but V5 was significantly increased(P=0.05)in the IMRT planning.The dose of esophagus,heart and spinal cord in the IMRT planning was lower than that of3D-CRT planning.Conclusion:For LANSCLC,IMRT has some dosimetric advantages over 3D-CRT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare dosimetric difference of treatment planning of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT)and intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer(LANSCLC).Methods:Ten LANSCLC patients to be treated by radiotherapy were investigated.3D-CRT and IMRT plannings were designed for each patient.The prescribed dose was 60Gy(2Gy/f×30f),95% of the planning target volume was covered by this dose for each patient.The dose was computed with treatment planning system of Eclipse 10.0 using convolution / superposition algorithm.Two plans were compared according to the homogeneity index(HI)and conformity index(CI)of dosimetry in the planning target volume and the parameters of dose-volume histogram(DVH)in normal tissue.Results:In the terms of CI and HI,IMRT radiotherapy planning was significantly superior to 3D-CRT plan(P0.05),the index of V20 and V30 in normal lung tissue of IMRT planning was significantly superior to the 3D-CRT planning(P0.05).There were no significant differences between the MLD and V15 in two kinds of planning,but V5 was significantly increased(P=0.05)in the IMRT planning.The dose of esophagus,heart and spinal cord in the IMRT planning was lower than that of3D-CRT planning.Conclusion:For LANSCLC,IMRT has some dosimetric advantages over 3D-CRT.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare dosimetric difference of treatment planning of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT)and intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer(LANSCLC).Methods:Ten LANSCLC patients to be treated by radiotherapy were investigated.3D-CRT and IMRT plannings were designed for each patient.The prescribed dose was 60Gy(2Gy/f×30f),95% of the planning target volume was covered by this dose for each patient.The dose was computed with treatment planning system of Eclipse 10.0 using convolution / superposition algorithm.Two plans were compared according to the homogeneity index(HI)and conformity index(CI)of dosimetry in the planning target volume and the parameters of dose-volume histogram(DVH)in normal tissue.Results:In the terms of CI and HI,IMRT radiotherapy planning was significantly superior to 3D-CRT plan(P0.05),the index of V20 and V30 in normal lung tissue of IMRT planning was significantly superior to the 3D-CRT planning(P0.05).There were no significant differences between the MLD and V15 in two kinds of planning,but V5 was significantly increased(P=0.05)in the IMRT planning.The dose of esophagus,heart and spinal cord in the IMRT planning was lower than that of3D-CRT planning.Conclusion:For LANSCLC,IMRT has some dosimetric advantages over 3D-CRT.

Key concepts: Radiation treatment planning, Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Dosimetry, Dose-volume histogram, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens