2005Clinical Medical Journal of ChinaRequires access

The Effect of Meglumine Cyclic Adenosine vs Milrinone on Cogestive Heart Fail- ure in Elderly Patients

Jing Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinical effects of treating congestive heart failure with Meglumine Cyclic Adenosine vs Milrinone. Methods: 80 inpatients with congestive heart failure were randomly divided into two groups. (1) meglumine cyclic adenosme (40 cases), (2) milrinone (40 cases). Patients in first group received MCA (30 mg) in 5% glucose 20 ml via intravenous injection, then MCA (150 mg) + 5% glucose 250 ml was injected intravenously once a day. The second group received milrinone 2. 5 mg four times each day. Results: After one week's treatment, the total clinical effective rates for each group were 87. 5% and 82. 5% respectively, while the difference in the two groups was not significant (P0. 05). Conclusion: MCA is an effective medicine in treatment of elderly congestive heart failure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To study the clinical effects of treating congestive heart failure with Meglumine Cyclic Adenosine vs Milrinone. Methods: 80 inpatients with congestive heart failure were randomly divided into two groups. (1) meglumine cyclic adenosme (40 cases), (2) milrinone (40 cases). Patients in first group received MCA (30 mg) in 5% glucose 20 ml via intravenous injection, then MCA (150 mg) + 5% glucose 250 ml was injected intravenously once a day. The second group received milrinone 2. 5 mg four times each day. Results: After one week's treatment, the total clinical effective rates for each group were 87. 5% and 82. 5% respectively, while the difference in the two groups was not significant (P0. 05). Conclusion: MCA is an effective medicine in treatment of elderly congestive heart failure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To study the clinical effects of treating congestive heart failure with Meglumine Cyclic Adenosine vs Milrinone. Methods: 80 inpatients with congestive heart failure were randomly divided into two groups. (1) meglumine cyclic adenosme (40 cases), (2) milrinone (40 cases). Patients in first group received MCA (30 mg) in 5% glucose 20 ml via intravenous injection, then MCA (150 mg) + 5% glucose 250 ml was injected intravenously once a day. The second group received milrinone 2. 5 mg four times each day. Results: After one week's treatment, the total clinical effective rates for each group were 87. 5% and 82. 5% respectively, while the difference in the two groups was not significant (P0. 05). Conclusion: MCA is an effective medicine in treatment of elderly congestive heart failure.

Key concepts: Milrinone, Medicine, Heart failure, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Meglumine Cyclic Adenosine vs Milrinone on Cogestive Heart Fail- ure in Elderly Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens