2014Forest Resources ManagementRequires access

Analysis of Ecological Carrying Capacity of National Key Ecological Function Areas in Hunshandake Based on Ecological Footprints

Meng Qing-hu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The ecological footprint analysis method was used to calculate the ecological footprint of the key ecological function areas in Hunshandake in 2012 and analyze their changes. The results showed that the ecological footprint was 5. 296 hm2per capita,and its ecological carrying capacity was 2. 429 hm2per capita,ecological deficit was 2. 867 hm2per capita,which reveals that this region has made full use of its various land resources. In terms of land use types:( 1) Per capita ecological footprint is the largest in natural energy resources land,followed by farmland and forest land;( 2) The largest ecological carrying capacity per capita is in its farmland,followed by grassland and forest land;( 3) Per capita ecological deficit is found in grassland,energy resources land and waterland,while the ecological surplus appears in the other ecological land types. Key measures of ecological protection and construction in this area are to protect grassland.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ecological footprint analysis method was used to calculate the ecological footprint of the key ecological function areas in Hunshandake in 2012 and analyze their changes. The results showed that the ecological footprint was 5. 296 hm2per capita,and its ecological carrying capacity was 2. 429 hm2per capita,ecological deficit was 2. 867 hm2per capita,which reveals that this region has made full use of its various land resources. In terms of land use types:( 1) Per capita ecological footprint is the largest in natural energy resources land,followed by farmland and forest land;( 2) The largest ecological carrying capacity per capita is in its farmland,followed by grassland and forest land;( 3) Per capita ecological deficit is found in grassland,energy resources land and waterland,while the ecological surplus appears in the other ecological land types. Key measures of ecological protection and construction in this area are to protect grassland.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ecological footprint analysis method was used to calculate the ecological footprint of the key ecological function areas in Hunshandake in 2012 and analyze their changes. The results showed that the ecological footprint was 5. 296 hm2per capita,and its ecological carrying capacity was 2. 429 hm2per capita,ecological deficit was 2. 867 hm2per capita,which reveals that this region has made full use of its various land resources. In terms of land use types:( 1) Per capita ecological footprint is the largest in natural energy resources land,followed by farmland and forest land;( 2) The largest ecological carrying capacity per capita is in its farmland,followed by grassland and forest land;( 3) Per capita ecological deficit is found in grassland,energy resources land and waterland,while the ecological surplus appears in the other ecological land types. Key measures of ecological protection and construction in this area are to protect grassland.

Key concepts: Ecological footprint, Per capita, Ecological deficit, Grassland, Carrying capacity, Ecology, Geography, Land use

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Ecological Carrying Capacity of National Key Ecological Function Areas in Hunshandake Based on Ecological Footprints — Research Paper | ScholarLens