ScholarLens Back to search
2009•Journal of Hebei North UniversityRequires access

Comparative Analysis between OLYMPUS AU5400 and VITROS5.1FS Auto-biochemical Analyzer

Jun Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the possibility of results comparision made by different biochemical inspection devices and the possibility of its clinic acceptability.Methods:According to EP9-A document request of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory of Standards(NCCLS),the comparative method(Y) was AU5400,Vitros5.1 FS was examination method(X).The linearities,recoveries,and correlativities of each substance were analyzed respectively.Results:Within-day and day-to-day,coefficients of variation were 0.40%～2.62% and 0.54%～3.33% respectively.The dilution degree of samples and the concentration values determined had good linear relationship.Compared with that of OLYMPUS AU5400,the correlation coefficient was between 0.910～0.997.Conclusion:The comparability of results in two detecting systems accorded to evaluation of the clinical is acceptable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To investigate the possibility of results comparision made by different biochemical inspection devices and the possibility of its clinic acceptability.Methods:According to EP9-A document request of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory of Standards(NCCLS),the comparative method(Y) was AU5400,Vitros5.1 FS was examination method(X).The linearities,recoveries,and correlativities of each substance were analyzed respectively.Results:Within-day and day-to-day,coefficients of variation were 0.40%～2.62% and 0.54%～3.33% respectively.The dilution degree of samples and the concentration values determined had good linear relationship.Compared with that of OLYMPUS AU5400,the correlation coefficient was between 0.910～0.997.Conclusion:The comparability of results in two detecting systems accorded to evaluation of the clinical is acceptable.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To investigate the possibility of results comparision made by different biochemical inspection devices and the possibility of its clinic acceptability.Methods:According to EP9-A document request of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory of Standards(NCCLS),the comparative method(Y) was AU5400,Vitros5.1 FS was examination method(X).The linearities,recoveries,and correlativities of each substance were analyzed respectively.Results:Within-day and day-to-day,coefficients of variation were 0.40%～2.62% and 0.54%～3.33% respectively.The dilution degree of samples and the concentration values determined had good linear relationship.Compared with that of OLYMPUS AU5400,the correlation coefficient was between 0.910～0.997.Conclusion:The comparability of results in two detecting systems accorded to evaluation of the clinical is acceptable.

Key concepts: Comparability, Coefficient of variation, Correlation coefficient, Spectrum analyzer, Linear correlation, Statistics, Mathematics, Chromatography

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Analysis between OLYMPUS AU5400 and VITROS5.1FS Auto-biochemical Analyzer — Research Paper | ScholarLens