2015Laboratory Medicine and ClinicRequires access

Comparability analysis between dry chemistry analyzer and wet chemistry analyzer

LI Jin-m

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the comparability of the results of 16 routine biochemical indexes detected by different biochemical analyzers.Methods With the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer as the reference system and the VITROS5600 automatic biochemical immune analyzer as the compared system according to the EP9-A2,guideline established by NCCLS.The 16 routine biochemical indexes were detected in serum of patients by the two instruments.The clinical acceptability of the VITROS5600 dry chemistry system was evaluated according to the judgment basis of 1/2allowable error of the external quality assessment in CLIA′88standard.Results The reference system and the compared system had better comparability.All tests showed good correlation between the two analytical systems.The biases of all tests were clinically acceptable,except for ALT,LDH,Crea,AST,Ca and TP.Conclusion The VITROS5600 dry chemical instrument could have good comparability with the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer.But the biases of ALT,AST,LDH,Ca and Crea and TP in the clinical comparison at multiple levels were not acceptable.It is necessary to establish the different reference ranges aiming at different methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the comparability of the results of 16 routine biochemical indexes detected by different biochemical analyzers.Methods With the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer as the reference system and the VITROS5600 automatic biochemical immune analyzer as the compared system according to the EP9-A2,guideline established by NCCLS.The 16 routine biochemical indexes were detected in serum of patients by the two instruments.The clinical acceptability of the VITROS5600 dry chemistry system was evaluated according to the judgment basis of 1/2allowable error of the external quality assessment in CLIA′88standard.Results The reference system and the compared system had better comparability.All tests showed good correlation between the two analytical systems.The biases of all tests were clinically acceptable,except for ALT,LDH,Crea,AST,Ca and TP.Conclusion The VITROS5600 dry chemical instrument could have good comparability with the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer.But the biases of ALT,AST,LDH,Ca and Crea and TP in the clinical comparison at multiple levels were not acceptable.It is necessary to establish the different reference ranges aiming at different methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the comparability of the results of 16 routine biochemical indexes detected by different biochemical analyzers.Methods With the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer as the reference system and the VITROS5600 automatic biochemical immune analyzer as the compared system according to the EP9-A2,guideline established by NCCLS.The 16 routine biochemical indexes were detected in serum of patients by the two instruments.The clinical acceptability of the VITROS5600 dry chemistry system was evaluated according to the judgment basis of 1/2allowable error of the external quality assessment in CLIA′88standard.Results The reference system and the compared system had better comparability.All tests showed good correlation between the two analytical systems.The biases of all tests were clinically acceptable,except for ALT,LDH,Crea,AST,Ca and TP.Conclusion The VITROS5600 dry chemical instrument could have good comparability with the Beckman DXC800 automatic biochemical analyzer.But the biases of ALT,AST,LDH,Ca and Crea and TP in the clinical comparison at multiple levels were not acceptable.It is necessary to establish the different reference ranges aiming at different methods.

Key concepts: Spectrum analyzer, Comparability, Hematology analyzer, Reference values, Chemistry, Computer science, Mathematics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparability analysis between dry chemistry analyzer and wet chemistry analyzer — Research Paper | ScholarLens