2009•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison between laparoscopic and open surgical high ligation of the internal spermatic vein].

Liu Qi-zhong, Kai Tian, Yue-Xi Zhang, Yilin Wang, Zhao Ping-yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein and open surgery in the treatment of varicocele. METHODS: We collected the clinical data of 85 cases of varicocele treated by laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein (the laparoscopic group) and another 47 that underwent open surgery (the open group) , and compared the results of treatment between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The operations were successful in all the cases. In the laparoscopic group, the mean operation time was (32.0 +/- 5.9) minutes, with little bleeding, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (3.0 +/- 1.6) days, with 3 cases (3.5%) of recurrence during the 3-12 months follow-up. In the open group, the mean operation time was (46.0 +/-7.2) minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (7.0 +/- 3.7) days, with 5 cases (10.6%) of recurrence during the same length of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic method for the treatment of varicocele is obviously superior to open surgery for its advantages of minimal invasiveness, fast recovery, sure effectiveness, few complications and low recurrence, particularly for those with bilateral varicocele who experienced recurrence after open surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein and open surgery in the treatment of varicocele. METHODS: We collected the clinical data of 85 cases of varicocele treated by laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein (the laparoscopic group) and another 47 that underwent open surgery (the open group) , and compared the results of treatment between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The operations were successful in all the cases. In the laparoscopic group, the mean operation time was (32.0 +/- 5.9) minutes, with little bleeding, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (3.0 +/- 1.6) days, with 3 cases (3.5%) of recurrence during the 3-12 months follow-up. In the open group, the mean operation time was (46.0 +/-7.2) minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (7.0 +/- 3.7) days, with 5 cases (10.6%) of recurrence during the same length of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic method for the treatment of varicocele is obviously superior to open surgery for its advantages of minimal invasiveness, fast recovery, sure effectiveness, few complications and low recurrence, particularly for those with bilateral varicocele who experienced recurrence after open surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein and open surgery in the treatment of varicocele. METHODS: We collected the clinical data of 85 cases of varicocele treated by laparoscope-guided high ligation of the internal spermatic vein (the laparoscopic group) and another 47 that underwent open surgery (the open group) , and compared the results of treatment between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The operations were successful in all the cases. In the laparoscopic group, the mean operation time was (32.0 +/- 5.9) minutes, with little bleeding, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (3.0 +/- 1.6) days, with 3 cases (3.5%) of recurrence during the 3-12 months follow-up. In the open group, the mean operation time was (46.0 +/-7.2) minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (7.0 +/- 3.7) days, with 5 cases (10.6%) of recurrence during the same length of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic method for the treatment of varicocele is obviously superior to open surgery for its advantages of minimal invasiveness, fast recovery, sure effectiveness, few complications and low recurrence, particularly for those with bilateral varicocele who experienced recurrence after open surgery.

Key concepts: Varicocele, Medicine, Surgery, Ligation, Open surgery, Spermatic Vein, Laparoscopic surgery, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison between laparoscopic and open surgical high ligation of the internal spermatic vein]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens