2007Fujian nongye xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus

Shaoying Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A pair of primers for RT-PCR to detect the classical swine fever virus(CSFV) were synthesized according to the published genome sequences of CSFV strains.After the RT-PCR method was established and optimized,15 clinic specimens were detected for CSFV by RT-PCR in comparison with the direct immunofluoresence assay (DFA).The result indicated that a 509 bp specifical fragment was obtained from the CSFV vaccine strains by RT-PCR with the sensitivity reaching 10 pg of CSFVRNA.Negative results were obtained from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus(PRRSV),porcine parvovirus(PPV),pseudorabies virus(PRV) and porcine circovirus Ⅱ(PCV2).The nucleotide sequence homology of RT-PCR products was 95%-99% of the other CSFV strains.The positive detection rate of the 15 clinic specimens reached 66.7% by RT-PCR,as compared to 60.0% by DFA.The two method's coincidence rate was 80%.These results indicated that the RTPCR method was more sensitive than DFA,and that both methods were suitable for rapid detection of CSFV.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A pair of primers for RT-PCR to detect the classical swine fever virus(CSFV) were synthesized according to the published genome sequences of CSFV strains.After the RT-PCR method was established and optimized,15 clinic specimens were detected for CSFV by RT-PCR in comparison with the direct immunofluoresence assay (DFA).The result indicated that a 509 bp specifical fragment was obtained from the CSFV vaccine strains by RT-PCR with the sensitivity reaching 10 pg of CSFVRNA.Negative results were obtained from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus(PRRSV),porcine parvovirus(PPV),pseudorabies virus(PRV) and porcine circovirus Ⅱ(PCV2).The nucleotide sequence homology of RT-PCR products was 95%-99% of the other CSFV strains.The positive detection rate of the 15 clinic specimens reached 66.7% by RT-PCR,as compared to 60.0% by DFA.The two method's coincidence rate was 80%.These results indicated that the RTPCR method was more sensitive than DFA,and that both methods were suitable for rapid detection of CSFV.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A pair of primers for RT-PCR to detect the classical swine fever virus(CSFV) were synthesized according to the published genome sequences of CSFV strains.After the RT-PCR method was established and optimized,15 clinic specimens were detected for CSFV by RT-PCR in comparison with the direct immunofluoresence assay (DFA).The result indicated that a 509 bp specifical fragment was obtained from the CSFV vaccine strains by RT-PCR with the sensitivity reaching 10 pg of CSFVRNA.Negative results were obtained from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus(PRRSV),porcine parvovirus(PPV),pseudorabies virus(PRV) and porcine circovirus Ⅱ(PCV2).The nucleotide sequence homology of RT-PCR products was 95%-99% of the other CSFV strains.The positive detection rate of the 15 clinic specimens reached 66.7% by RT-PCR,as compared to 60.0% by DFA.The two method's coincidence rate was 80%.These results indicated that the RTPCR method was more sensitive than DFA,and that both methods were suitable for rapid detection of CSFV.

Key concepts: Classical swine fever, Pseudorabies, Porcine parvovirus, Porcine circovirus, Virology, Virus, Biology, Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus — Research Paper | ScholarLens