A Comparative Study of Nozick and Rawls: A Theory of Individual Rights
Gong Qun
Abstract
Gong Qun
Abstract
In his debate with John Rawls, Nozick raised a theory of justice that contains holding justice, transferring justice, and rectifying justice. He criticized Rawls' distribution theory on the basis of this theory, which demonstrates that the orientation of his theory is individual rights. However, Nozick has totally neglected the importance of equality. Thus, he is not aware of the importance of coordination of justice in social cooperation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In his debate with John Rawls, Nozick raised a theory of justice that contains holding justice, transferring justice, and rectifying justice. He criticized Rawls' distribution theory on the basis of this theory, which demonstrates that the orientation of his theory is individual rights. However, Nozick has totally neglected the importance of equality. Thus, he is not aware of the importance of coordination of justice in social cooperation.
Key concepts: Economic Justice, Original position, Primary goods, Sociology, Law and economics, Distribution (mathematics), Political science, Law